◆ SpookStack

MING: MALCOLM X: MING: MALCOLM Xz MING: eo (1@ and then it goes on to explain why and then down at the bottom it condenns the aduinisatration for trying to water down & eivil rights bill which it considered stronger thas one they had originally intended. The point that I'm making ia that the New York Times condemned the -: arn administration and condemned the President aad bis brother for backing down on what it had - considered in the first place & moral issu® ©... and it condemned both the Attorney General: -— and the President again for watering the «+ bill down before it bad even gotten out there. in the field. ; But MALCOLM don't you realise the great -- strength of the efforts that have been made on behalf of Negroes in the United Btates has been that legally the opponents of abolishing discrimination have been defeated ever tine, they've been able to muster no substantial defense. The Urbas League from the social work personnel point of view bas produced irreputable arguments. MARTIN LUTHER KING to use as a symbol if I may be permitted to bas produced a moral and a ethical position which is (inaudible). Now when you turn to talking of separation and violence don't you really furnish our opponents with something that they can argue about without being able to meet them with the assurance that the NAACP can do on the legal front the Urban League and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference aad other church groups and so on. Xow that's what The New York Times again on....0 I don’t care about the New York Tines. I'm asking you. ot Whenever I seen to make an objective analysis from my own point of view over the dilly—-dallying ef these politidans it's made to impair that k'm a criminal. Well certainly not by me. - 32 = ot 4 obiet