Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ADocumentaryHistoryOfTheCubanMissileCrisis1962
Page 191
191 / 354
62. (Continued)
wey
. Gira
The argument in favor of the blockade was principally that it
initiated a positive action which could be intensified at our will or
could be relaxed depending upon evelving cir¢umstances. Soviet
reactions are expected to be severe and very.probably involve a
blockade of Berlin and a widespread propaganda effort, however it was
considered that we could have some control aver the extent of Soviet
reaction and in the event of a confrontation, would be negotiating from
a position of positive action which would be intengified at our own
direction. ;
The obvious disadvantayes are the protracted nature of the
operation, the difficulties of sustaining our position in world opinion
because of our own complex of foreign bases and our deployment of
offensive missiles and nuclear weapons and finally, the action does
not reverse the present trend of building an offensive capability within
Cuba nor does it dispose of the existing missiles, planes, and nuclear
weapons if the latter now exist there. ‘
'
?
Positive military action initiated now appeared desirable because
of the impact of current and future world opinion, the spectacle of a
powerful nation attacking by surprise attack a weak and insignificant
neighbor, engagement by the United States in a ‘surprise attack" thus
giving license to others to do the same, the indefendable position we
would be in with our allies, and finally, the price to us of extreme
actions of which the Soviets appear capable of executing.
The above course of action is by no means unanimous. The
opinions range from doing nothing on the oné hand, to immediate military
action on the other There exist differences.of opinion as to the handling
of Khrushchev, Castro, NATO, the OAS and Latin American states;
and finally, a question of the "declaration of war'' awaits legal opinion;
also differences exist concerning the intensity of the blockade with some
advocating a mae comprehensive blockade which would include POL
at the very start. bot
I would like guidance from USIB members for my use-in further
discussions which are to take place commencing at 11:00 a,.m.,
October 19th, and will probably continue throughout the week end.
, '
i
yoy
‘John A. McCone
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic