◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

BayOfPigsVolumeIVTheTaylorCommitteeInvestigationOfTheBayOfPigs

312 pages · May 08, 2026 · Document date: Aug 7, 1984 · Broad topic: War & Geopolitics · Topic: Taylor Committee Investigation · 5 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
Projects Division of CIA and who became the air operations officer for the WH/4 task force at Headquarters. The primary concern of the committee with reference to Colonel Germosen was whether the T-33s were considered to be a threat, and if they were. a threat, whether they had been selected specifically as air targets during the 0-2 or planned D-Day air strikes. Colonel Germosen's testimony was quite direct; he apparently was quite self-composed in stating that there were no in- structions for the pilots to go after T-33s in particular. The instructions for 0-2 were to knock out all offensive aircraft photographed in the parking areas of the three selected airfields. Colonel Germosen also refuted the testimony of I IWhO had told the committee that the B-26s in Castro's inventory were of far more concern than the T-33s. Colonel Germosen pointed out that Castro's T-33 inventory was located at the three airfields selected for attack on 0-2; and he told the committee that of Castro's five T-33s, three were knocked out by the 0-2 strikes, but one of these was back. in the action by 0+1 (18 April 1961). When queried about the origin of the 0-2 strike, the officer had to plead ignorance. After he indicated some reservations about the wisdom of the 0-2 strike, one committee member took a cheap shot at Colonel Germosen by saying "I have real doubt in my mind as to whether you did well by accepting those other 118/* D-2 strikes." * The record does read " •••other 0-2 strikes," but there was only one 0-2 strike at three airfields. It was not Germosen's respon- sibility "to accept" or not accept the 0-2 strike plan. 125 ;j
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 132
Jump straight to page 132 of 312.
Reader
Taylor Committee Investigation Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the War & Geopolitics archive hub and the more specific Taylor Committee Investigation topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
pigs operation soviet control induce
Related subtopics
SOVIET PROPAGANDA ACTIVITIES IN CUBA
2 documents · 1184 known pages
Subtopic
1P Ee
1 documents · 3 known pages
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic