Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
BayOfPigsVolumeIVTheTaylorCommitteeInvestigationOfTheBayOfPigs
Page 205
205 / 312
Under the conditions which. developed we are
inclined to believe that the beachhead could
not have survived for long without substantial
help from the Cuban population or without overt
US assistance.
Although under these conditions
the guerrilla alternative did not exist, with
control of the air the CEF might have been able
to withdraw wholly or in part by the sea.
!21
It was this portion of Memorandum No. 1 which moved
committee members Burke and Dulles to take the only exception
recorded in the CSG report:
Admiral Burke and Mr. Dulles consider that
there is insufficient evidence to support
the conjectures in this paragraph.
The
well motivated, aggressive CEF fought
extremely well without air cover and with
a shortage of ammunition.
They inflicted
very severe losses on the less well trained
Cuban militia.
Consequently, it is reasonable
to believe that if the CEF had ammunition and
air cover, they could have held the beachhead
for a much longer time, destroyed much of the
enemy artillery and tanks on the roads before
they reached the beachhead, prevented observation
of the fire of artillery that might have been
placed in position, and destroyed many more of
the local militia en route to the area.
A local
success by the landing party, coupled with CEF
aircraft overflying Cuba with visible control
of the air, could well have caused a chain
reaction, of success throughout Cuba with re-
sultant 'defection of some of the militia,
increasing support from the populace, and
eventual success of the operation. 20/
Even here, however, not enough stress was placed on the
fact that restrictions on the use of Brigade aircraft guaranteed
the operation's failure.
Each of the above responses indicated
acceptance of the testimony from the first and second meetings
199
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
pigs operation
soviet control induce
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic