Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP81R00560R000100010002 9
Page 28
28 / 68
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010002-9
Closer examination revealed unidentifiable white object
and what appeared to be two “small adults” who, apparently
startled by Zamora’s appearance, took off with “ear-splitting roar.”
the markings on the object, this under instructions from
Army Intelligence. But the Lorenzens already had secured
this information and did not press the already put-upon
patrolman. That afternoon, as the Lorenzens were leaving
town, they saw Zamora back.on his job, “standing by the
door of a car which was pulled to the curb in front of his
prowl. car. He had his ticket book in hand, and his pen
poised. Business as usual.” C(ARPO Bulletin, May, 1964)
But business as usual was not to be the case either for
Zamora or for the town of Socorro in the next several days.
The account had been given international news coverage
and had attracted interest from scientists, investigators and
the curious. The Air Force sent out a major from its Kirt-
land Base in Albuquerque and followed this up with their
consulting scientist, Dr. J. Allen Hynek, head of the Astron-
omy Department at Northwestern University. a
To Dr. Hynek has fallen the difficult task of having to
minimize the importance of certain sightings in keeping
26
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 :
with the Air Force policy of looking upon all UFOs reports
as “errors, hallucinations or hoaxes.”’ At a closed hearing
of the House Armed Services Committee, in April 1966, Dr.
Hynek acknowledged that this hypothesis for the Air Force
had been “very successful,” but it could stand in the path
of research for “if one digs too intently for coal he is apt
to miss diamonds. . . . And in dealing with truly puz-
zling cases, we have tended either to say that, if an investi-
gation had been pursued long enough, the misidentified
object would have been recognized, or that the sighting
had no validity to begin with.” (The UFO Investigator,
NICAP, May-June 1966.)
But at the time of the Socorro incident, “digging for coal”
was the adopted approach and one of Dr. Hynek’s first ques-
tions was Why, if the UFO had been seen, had it not been
reported on radar “in an area that is infested with radar.”
The APRO investigators were the ones who pointed out
that the radar station in that area was not in operation at
CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010002-9
“w
|
!
|
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
ufo
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic