Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP96 00788r000100330001 5
Page 48
48 / 88
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000100330001-5
TEN LESSONS OF LEBANON.
American medical students greeted 82nd
Airborne sergeant with relief when troop
landed at Grenada to topple Soviet-backed
regime. Courtesy of Department of Defense
Still Photo Collection.
willing to sacrifice its soldiers to eradicate
the spectre of international terrorism in
Lebanon resulted in the dispatch of U.S.
Marines, with tragic results.
In an open letter to President Reagan
(The New York Times, February 27, 1983)
more than 130 retired generals and
admirals correctly noted that ‘*. . . Israeli
ports and bases would be open instantly to
U.S. forces in the event of a serious
strategic threat to the Middle East. Israel
constitutes the only U.S. ally capable of
immediate parry to a serious thrust
against free world interests in this theater.
And, Israel’s continued sharing of vital in-
telligence on Soviet operations constitutes
the other essential element of U.S. securi-
ty in the Middle East.”
5. Terrorist tactics, as employed in
Lebanon, permit radical countries to
attack the free world in a manner if done
overtly, would ordinarily constitute war
and justify a military response under
international law. As a result the U.S.
must be prepared and willing to retaliate
by bombing vital targets of nations in-
volved in organizing terrorist outrages.
According to Washington sources the Ad-
ministration is now asking the Joint
Chiefs of Staff to find military answers to
terrorist attacks.
6. If the Beirut attacks are any indica-
tion, terrorists will be employing more
lethal weapons in the future inflicting
heavy casualties and causing massive
destruction. A recent Pentagon study
correctly points out that combating
terrorism ‘“‘requires an active policy. A
reactive policy only forfeits the initiative
to the terrorists.’”” No precautions,
regardless how elaborate, can assure com-
plete safety if terrorists are willing to die
for their cause. The best we can hope for
is to reduce the potential destructiveness
of terrorism.
SPECIAL EDITION -- TERRORISM --
.. Continued
26 JUNE 1984
Ted tf ™
(ALE NATO
LE BIER! F
Lat ?
GERI
A victim of terrorist kidnapping, Brigadier General James L. Dozier displays newspaper
announcing his release by Italian forces. Courtesy Department of Defense Still Photo
Collection.
7, Our experience in Lebanon is a dire
warning that the U.S. must adopt new
strategies and tactics to fight terrorism,
The pre-emptive strike in Grenada and
our support of counter-insurgency forces
in Cental America, Southeast Asia and
Africa are the beginning of a long overdue
change in U.S. policy.
8. The aborted Iranian rescue mission
and the debacle in Lebanon also raise
serious questions about the ability of the
United States to conduct successful
military missions. U.S. News and World
Report (Feb 27, 1984) charges that ‘“‘a
confusing command structure
sometimes leaves everyone and no one
responsible for the success or failure of a
military operation.’? Newsweek (Feb 27,
1984) raises disturbing questions about the
“absence of decision making’? in
Washington.
The United States must:
e Prepare “U.S. military forces to
defend against and counter terrorism.”
(Pentagon Study, Dec. 1983)
¢ Streamline the military command
structure.
e Increase the authority of the chair-
man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in order
to reduce and eventually eliminate in-
terservice rivalries in combat situations.
¢ Provide for a more integrated in-
telligence service.
9. Events since World War Il — in
China, Korea, Vietnam and now Lebanon
— clearly demonstrate that American
45
military intervention will fail unless two
basic conditions prevail:
e The clear and unquivocal support
of Congress and the American people.
¢ A total commitment by the people of
the countries under attack. We cannot
and should not commit U.S. military per-
sonnel to fight the battles of other people
who themselves are unwilling to make
sacrifices and carry the major burden of
such conflicts.
The only exceptions would be in cases
where vital U.S. security interests are at
stake.
10. A major terrorist objective is to
create an atmosphere of chaos, confusion
and fear. Regardless how intense and
ruthless terrorism becomes, we must not
panic. If we do, terrorists will have
accomplished one of their major goals. In
many ways terrorists are weak and
vulnerable. Their defeats far outnumber
their victories. Many groups like the Red
Brigades, Baader-Meinhof, Turkish
terrorists, the PLO and others have been
weakened or neutralized. Terrorism
cannot destroy a powerful nation like the
U.S., but it may cause mass paranoia and
give rise to a siege mentality. The success
or failure of terrorism will be largely
determined by the willingness of the free
world to confront and combat it. A policy
of appeasement, as events in Lebanon
clearly demonstrated, will give impetus to
an acceleration of terrorism on world-
wide basis. Oo
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000100330001-5
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic