Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP96 00788r001800210001 0
Page 9
9 / 57
Approved For Release 2002/Qe6iea@HPPpee-00788R001800210001-0
_ CS/NF)
and so forth. The potential applications of this phenomenon to intelli-
gence goals and missions are apparent.
(S/NF) In addition to remote viewing, psychokinesis (PK) and counter-
measures have been investigated on a small scale. Again, results of studies
in these areas may be found in end-of-year project task reports for FYs
1981, 1982, and 1983. Lack of funding has precluded extensive work in
these, as well as other areas of potential DoD interest. In future pro-
grams, investigating additional topics and placing contracts with additional
laboratories will be emphasized.
(U) Invariably, the following questions arise when parapsychology is
mentioned: (1) Is it a fake or a fraud? (2) Is it a trick or is it a real
phenomenon? (3) Are the practioners magicians, charlatans, or entertainers?
The next section of this report seeks to establish that, while some of
these elements are present in the field, the work at SRI is carried out
with all the rigors and disciplines applied to any scientific investigation.
(U) At various times, estimates of the reliability of remote-viewing
data have been made. The figures are usually expressed as percent accuracy
or reliability, but there is no standard method for calculating these
percentages. For instance, if we say that remote-viewing data are 70
percent reliable, do we mean that 70 percent of the time we get data that
are 100 percent accurate, or do we mean that 70 percent. of the time we get
some accurate data, or do we mean that, on the average, 70 percent of the
data are correct? The possibilities are almost endless. Confusion on
these points is not surprising when widely-diverging estimates or claims
with regard to remote-viewing reliability are encountered.
(U) As we are now ending our authentication and verification year,
it is imperative that we establish a single method for calculating and
reporting the reliability of data gathered by remote viewing. The pitfalls
in doing this are numerous. The most apparent difficulty is that the data
are reported subjectively and verbally, and then must be expressed mathe-
matically. To solve these problems and to standardize reporting, a system
to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of remote viewing has been developed
and is in current use. A description of the technique is given in Appendix A.
SEGRE
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001800210001-0
ee
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic