Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP96 00789r001001420001 3
Page 23
23 / 63
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001001420001-3
tainted by . sensationalism and some
charlatanism....The dramatic and the absurd
overtones of the popular culture aspect of ESP
has [sic] led even the more conservative elements
of the popular press ta treat ESP as a
novelty....Major centers of ESP research in the
West, at Utrecht, London and Duke University,
have come under suspicion from many scientists.
As a result, researchers...have labored to prove
an effect which the Soviets accept and attempt to
explain--and control (12:40).
Dr. Beaumont’s comments are certainly proven true when
one considers the continued skepticism of the scientific.
community in view of the extraordinary potential Soviet.
threat. According to Russell Targ, one of the reasons
psi research has suffered is that critics suggest any
acceptance of scientific data in the field of psychic
research would be inherently irrational (24:77). A survey
of America’s elite scientists, which elicited 353 responses
from 497 council members and committee members of the
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS),
was published in June 1982. The study states:
Although recent studies hint that belief in
ESP may be increasing among the general
population and among the scientific community,
the elite scientific group polled by this study
demonstrated the highest level of skepticism of
any major group surveyed within the last twenty
years (32:127).
Also mentioned in this report was a movement started
in 1979 that sought to disaffiliate the Parapsychology
Association from the AAAS. It is interesting to note that
“among this elite group, believers in ESP tend to cite
personal experience as grounds for their belief. Skeptics
tend to cite a priori reasons as grounds for disbelief"
(32: 128). Th prevailing concepts" and negative peer
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA- RDP96- 60789R001001420001 -3
a1
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic