Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP96 00789r003100140001 2
Page 32
32 / 40
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003100140001-2
Conscious Mind,
Sleeping Brain
Perspectives on Lucid Dreaming
Edited by
Jayne Gackenbach
University of Northern Iowa
Cedar Fails, lowa
and
Stephen LaBerge
Stanford University
Stanford, California
Pade
Plenum Press ¢ New York and London
The Psychophysiology of Lucid
Dreaming
STEPHEN LABERGE
LUCID DREAMING PHYSIOLOGICALLY VERIFIED
Although we are usually unaware of the fact that we are dreaming while we are
dreaming, at times a remarkable exception occurs, and our consciousness be-
comes lucid enough for us to realize that we are dreaming. Lucid dreamers report
being able to freely remember the circumstances of waking life, to think clearly,
and to act deliberately upon reflection, all the while experiencing a dream world
that seems vividly real (Green, 1968; LaBerge, 1985a). This is all in contrast to
the usual characterization of dreams as typically lacking any reflective awareness
or true volition (Rechtschaffen, 1978).
Indeed, the concept of conscious Sleep can seem so self-contradictory and
paradoxical to certain ways of thinking that some theoreticians have considered
lucid dreams impossible and even absurd. Probably the most extreme example of
this point of view is provided by Malcolm (1959), who argued that if being
asleep means experiencing nothing whatsoever, ‘‘dreams’’ are not experiences
during sleep at all but only the reports we tell after awakening. This concept of
sleep led Malcolm to conclude that the idea that someone might reason while
asleep is ‘tmeaningless.’’ From here, the philosopher reasoned that
If ‘‘] am dreaming” could express a judgment it would imply the judgment ‘I am
asleep,’ and therefore the absurdity of the latter proves the absurdity of the former.”’
Thus “‘the supposed judgement that one is dreaming"’ is ‘‘unintelligible’’ and ‘‘an
inherently absurd form of words (Malcolm, 1959, pp. 48-50)
The point of this example is to show the skeptical light in which accounts of
lucid dreaming were viewed before physiological proof of the reality of the
STEPHEN LABERGE « Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003100140001-2
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic