◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

DoJReportOnCIAMailOpening

57 pages · May 08, 2026 · Document date: Jun 11, 1975 · Broad topic: Intelligence Operations · Topic: Concerning Its Investigation
← Back to feed
" • e Approved For Release 2008/11/06: CIA-RDP04M01816R000502010009-4 - 52 than is necessary to that end.34/ The standards that guide presidential conduct and the conduct of the Department of Justice draw their substance from the evolving principles of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Under those standards the , East Coast Project could not now lawfully be approved.35/ 34/ Cf. United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. ,96 S:- Ct. 3074 (1976) (cars may be stopped without probable cause bra warrant for a brief scrutiny, so long as the overall pro- ,·. gram of stopping cars is reasonable and productive); Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967) (warrants to search houses may be obtained on probable cause to believe that a building code violation has occurred). Building on this and similar Supreme Court analyses, the Administration proposed legislation to provide for the issuance of a judicial warrant authorizing the use of electronic sur- veillance in foreign intelligence and foreign counterintelligence cases. That legislation would have required proof of probable cause that the target of the surveillance was a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power and a submission of a certification signed by a high level executive official that the information sought was necessary to the·foreign intelligence or foreign tounterintelligence needs of the federal government. It also required the court's review of procedures to minimize the acqui- sition and retention of extraneous information. 35/ See United States v. Brown, supra; United States v. Butenko, supra; United States v. Ehrlich:man. supra. On the constitutional standards for the approval of domestic wiretaps, see Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (1967); Katz v. United States, supra; United States v. Kahn, 415 U.S. 143 (I9i'4); United States v. Scott, 516 F.2d 751 {D.C. Cir. 1975); certiorari aenied, 425 U.S. 917 (1976). Cf. United States v. Donovan, certiorari granted. 424 U.S. 907 (1976), argued October 13, 1976. A roved For Release 2008/11/06: CIA-RDP04M01816R000502010009-4
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 53
Jump straight to page 53 of 57.
Reader
Concerning Its Investigation Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the Intelligence Operations archive hub and the more specific Concerning Its Investigation topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
Related subtopics
Cambridge Five Spy Ring
41 documents · 2950 known pages
Subtopic
MKULTRA
28 documents · 928 known pages
Subtopic
Interpol
17 documents · 1676 known pages
Subtopic
Basque Intelligence Service
10 documents · 965 known pages
Subtopic
Release 2000 08
2 documents · 77 known pages
Subtopic
08 08 Cia-Rdp96-00789R000100260002-1
1 documents · 4 known pages
Subtopic