◆ SpookStack

“AND THAT SAC DID NOT LIKE THE IDEA OF ANY ELEMENT OF COMPULSION BEING INVOLVED OR POSSIBLY PUBLICIZED. WEAVER STATED HE WOULD, . THEREFORE, HOLD OFF ON THE SUBPOENA, BUT SAID THAT HE SIMPLY HAS TO GET WORD TO THE GRAND JURY AND TO THE JUDGE NO LATER THAN THURSDAY, FEBRUARY SIXTH, AS TO WHAT ACTION WE CONTEMPLATE TAKING, | WEAVER STATED THAT THIS GRAND JURY IS THE SAME ONE WHICH INDICTED THE NATIONAL STATES RIGHTS PARTY MEMBERS FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN CONNECTION WITH THE SCHOOL DESEGREGATION MATTER.IN BIRMINGHAM THIS PAST FALL, AND THAT BY AND LARGE THE GRAND JURORS APPEAR TO BE A SUBSTANTIAL GROUP OF CITIZENS AND HE FEELS THAT THEY WOULD MAKE NO UNREASONABLE REQUEST. BY UNREASONABLE HE SAID HE MEANS THAT A GENERAL STATEMENT WOULD PROBABLY SATISFY THEM AND THERE WOULD BE NO RECORD MADE OF THE COMMENTS OF THE BUREAU REPRESENTATIVE AND THERE WOULD BE NO SPECIFIC REQUEST FOR DETAILS WHICH WOULD JEOPARDIZE THE SUCCESS OF ANY INVESTIGATION NOR WOULD THERE BE THE REQUEST FOR THE IDENTITY OF INFORMANTS. WEAVER NOTED THAT EVEN IF THERE WAS A POSSIBLE SEEPAGE OF GENERAL INFORMATION FROM THE GRAND JURY WE COULD CONVEY THE IMPLICATION THAT WE KNOW A LOT MORE ABOUT THIS THING THAN WE ACTUALLY DO AND IF THIS FILTERED BACK TO SOME OF THE SUSPECTS IT MIGHT HAVE A SALUTARY EFFECT ON