Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Birmingham, Alabama Sixteenth — Part 29
Page 109
109 / 249
Memorandum to Mr. Wannall
Re: BAPBOM
jointly participate with his investigators in any additional
investigation which might be conducted and that if this were
not possibie, that resuits of our prior interviews of certain named
individuals be made available to him. He was advised that if
he had any new information, we would conduct any necessary
additional investigation but that Agents could not be made
available to assist him. SAC, Birmingham, recommended that the
request be resisted because Baxley declined to explain the
nature of bis "new information" and because disclosure of resuits
of prior interviews might lead to breaches of confidentiality
regarding persons previously interviewed. However, Mr. Baxley's
request was #gain forwarded to the Civil Rights Division with
advice that we were taking no further action in the absence of
Specific instructions from the Department. No such instructions
were received, Departmental Attorney William Gardiner, Civil
Rights Division, subsequently inquired telephonically as to the .,
action desired by the Bureau in this matter. It was pointed out
to him that Baxley declined to furnish any of his information to
us, the disclosure of some of the investigations requested might
result in compromising confidentialities, but that the decision
regarding dissemination was that of the Department.
Mr. Havel was apprised of the above background. He
requested that the Civil Rights Division be contacted and that he
be advised of the results. On 12/1/75 this matter was discussed
with Departmental Attorney Gardiner who stated the Department's
case is closed, that it has no objection to furnishing the
requested information to Baxley and that he, Gardiner, will forward
a communication so stating. Mr. Havel was advised accordingly.
Our investigation in this matter was closed in 1973
except for the submission by Birmingham of logical fingerprints for
comparison with latent prints recovered during the investigation.
ACTION
1. It is recommended that upon receipt of the Department's
communication, SAC, Birmingham, be instructed to make available to
Mr. Baxley the results of our prior interviews of persons previously
namad hv him.
Sai oe os mee e
2. SAC, Birmingham is being alerted telephonically of the
impending request.
al; i
edge \ -
pe
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic