Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ABSCAM — Part 3
Page 21
21 / 76
an te rman ge
2 Te tegen :
The Leak - A Non~-criminal Violation
a oan criminal Violation
I'm not a lawyer, but I an very familiar with Title 18, Section
793, U.S. Code, which relates to Unauthorized Disclosures of Classified
Defense Information. When we speak of a "leak," the U. S. public has
become conditioned to thinking of it in the terms of the disclosure of
Top Secret, Secret, or Confidential data which would be prejudiced to
the best interests of our National Defense. The Abscam leak is not a
classified disclosure. It is simply an Administrative impropriety on
someone's part which I can't believe would even carry a one-day jail
term. Mr. Civiletti only threatened to fire the culprit if he was a
Justice Department employee.
I really have to laugh at this point as I've personally conducted
investigations of some of the most earthshaking classified leaks we've
had during my time at the Defense Department and have been hamstrung by
the investigative methods I was permitted to use. Yet, because of the
embarrassment to the parties involved, Mr. Blumenthal speaks of rolling
out some big weapons - mind you, for an Administrative leak - such as
the polygraph; subpoena power to even possibly call members of the
press; in-house wiretaps; and, of course, the taking of sworn statements
from suspects. It has yet to be determined just what authority Mr.
Prettyman will have. You can bet Government employee morale will be
lower after their respective inquisitions.
Mr. Civiletti could discreetly have requested his in-house police
force ~ the Office of Professional Responsibility - to conduct the
inquiry for the suspected leaker. Why didn't he?
Motivation
Okay, and now to work. Throughout my "leak-chasing" years, I
developed several categories in which a leak case would normally fall,
id.e., Political, Retaliatory, Conscience, Military Budget, Contrived,
etc. Once the category is identified, then pursuing the leaker is
easier. The Abscam leak had me puzzled for some time because I couldn't
fit it into a particular category. Finally, I realized it had to be
Political and the following is the manner in which it was so deduced.
First, looking for motivation of the parties involved caused me
after examination to eliminate then one at a time. FBI Director
William Webster, he's relatively new on the job; has an impeccable
reputation and could gain nothing but criticism from the leak. Attorney
General Benjamin Civiletti, the man who knowingly would end up with the
most egg on his face, certainly would have no reason to cause the leak.
Then, as in any mystery, there are the butlers ~ Mr. Neil Welch, who is
the Assistant Director of the New York FBI Office, became a well-known
white collar crime fighter while Special Agent in Charge of the Philadelphia
Office. Mr. Welch headed the FBI drive in the Abscam case; and Mr. Thomas
Puccio, the Brooklyn Federal Prosecutor in charge of the overall Abscam
investigation. Conceivably, each of these two men, if angered by
mer mene eae
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Hub
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic