Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ACLU — Part 3
Page 2
2 / 5
ORegon 5-5990
‘’ Weekly Bulletin #1583 ~
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, 170 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK 10, N°Y.
ROGER N. BALOWIN > ERNEST ANGELL "ARTHUR GARFIELD HAYS — °
China., Nef"! Comm. “ Chma. B'd of Directors , MORRIS L. ERNST. .
PATRICK MURPHY MALIN
Executive Director
Counsel
" ACLU ASKS PROBE OF POLICE BRUTALITY PACT IN NEW YORK crTy
ACLU has asked for an investigation into the alleged secret pact between the!
Justice Dept. and the New York City police whereby the FBI would observe a hands-off
policy when charges of brutality against New York Policemen were raised. | ORES
According to the New York World-Telegram and Sun, which disclosed the alleged
agreement, investigation of such cases was to have been undertaken by the city police
themselves, The paper charged that the arrangement had been made by Police Commis
sioner George Monaghan and the former chief of the Justice Department's criminal :
division, James P, McInerney, When it was made known to former Attorney General -
acting commissioner. of police, the Chicago division of ACLU eskcd the court to dociare
exposes them to co
- FB Ginpm wager senvigg:
James P,-McGrannery—in_January-,-said_the_newspaper,,—the—agreement-was—abrogated,
In a letter to Attorney General Herbert Brownell, ACLU's executive director, =
Patrick Murphy Nalin, said: "We, of course, have no way of knowing of the accuracy:
of these reports, but the source is so well respected that it seems to us that this
charge should immediately be investigated.....We urge that you ask the grand jury-2¢
soon to probe the brutality charge against the New York police, to investigate also.
whether or not this agreement was in fact entered into and if so, whether it was‘
violation of federal law," =
Malin's statement, joined in by the New York Civil Libertics Union, continued:
"The World-Telcgram and Sun's disclosure only highlights what is a growing civil
libertics problem in our city - police brutality. In 1950 the NYCLU investigated
40 different complaints; this total was doubled in 1951; the past year has seen
marked reduction in the numbcr of cases coming to our attention, It is difficul
obtain data relating to ponding civil damage actions against the city resulting f
police brutality, false arrest, or other abuses of police authority; but a conse.
tive estimate is that thcy amount to more than $3,000,000," a A wn
ACLU is only one of many civil groups that has demanded an investigation o
llcged pact, The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is.
nother organization seeking a federal investigation, So , ee tt
r
Meanwhile, a federal grand jury in New York has
against New York police, .. Tae
¢
been reviewing brutality
+ . we
Dose tae rs
cays
Aes
"+ AGLU_IN CHICAGO PRESSES FIGHT AGAINST “THE MIRACLE BAN. >.<
~
ACLU has now gone into Cook County circuit court, to get clearance for showings
in Chicago of the motion picture "The Miracle", «. ge eR ™
. - fate *
oy = TM
_. In a suit fi
led against Kayor Martin H. Kennelly and" TMmothy’ J. o'connse:
~ pte ~ Tyee 1
unconstitutional the censorship provisions of the city's municipal codec, The Union
together with Charles Liebman, had asked for a permit to show the film, but wero.”
turned down by Commissioner O'Connor, A later appeal was rejected by Mayor K
a EES Vee goth tte rows
ACLU contends that parts of the municipal code violate both the state ¢ nstity
tion and the First and Fourtoonth Amendments to the U.3. Constitution. The cod make:
it unlawful to show any movie without a permit. And it says it is the duty of the =
police commissioner to refuse a permit for any picture that is "immoral or obscene,
portrays depravity, criminality, or lack of virtuc of a class of citizens...
ntempt.....or tends to produce a breach of the PCACR as prowl
tae < Seed
This, ACLU maintains, is contrary to the law of the land;,
nance deprives people of the frecdon of speech and of the Preps
constitutional provisions, et Ey BS
ry
sok te.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Hub
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic