Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Abner Zwillman — Part 2
Page 75
75 / 141
Under cross-examination MENDELS said that the
Alkuno partners were ZWILLMAN, MICHAEL LASCARI, and KUNO
= HAYMAN. MENDELS also testified that at the time he invested
& in Alkuno he had no knowledge of the business, did not
~~ investigate the company, did not know how much the other
{ partners had invested, and had nothing to do with the
company's policies or management. He worked in the Shipping
and Packing Departments and signed payroll checks.
MENDELS insisted he was not a ZWILLMAN nominee in
Alkuno. He testified that he paid taxes on his earnings,
The income tax evasion trial lasted approximately
five weeks during Which ZWILLMAN's holdings in various
companies were brought out, all of Which have been mentioned
previously. As mentioned, the basis of the trial was the
net worth of ZWILLMAN.
After the completion of Government testimony, the
defense counsel, former Middlesex County State Senator JOHN E.
TOOLAN, stated that, "We have very very carefully considered
and analyzed ali the evidence, and after very serious consider-
ation and deliberation I assume the responsibility as defense
counsel of saying we take the position that neither in law
nor in fact has the Government proved this defendant had one
dollar of income other than is shown on his tax return,
ie "We go even further, we say the Government has
2 proved as We said they wouid in our opening, that this
defendant has no income other than that shown on his tax
are return.
"Therefore, we have decided to calli no Witnesses
but to rest on the Government's case,"
The case Was given to a jury on February 29, 1956,
After 30 hours of deliberation the jury reported at 6:00
pem, on March 1, 1956, that they could not agree on a
verdict. The press reported that the deliberations of the
jury had been as heated as they were prolonged.
Various reports in the press placed the jury count
in the panel as ranging from 10 to 2 for acquittal tc an even
6 to 6 split. The most persistent rumor as related in the
reports was 8 to 4 in favor of the defendant. -
on T_T”
~18-
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic