◆ SpookStack

Bre e omliegevasr sul. as bee Beer mede ah toie caEe Bat Bee Roo Bubs queers te trie’ apd diacharge of the jurs, _- Zee ts Cann li BE Bry Quxeitsor as to secrecy in the jury roo. Be +1.2 any daw enfurcemest agency cannot be inbibited tr . mnt “a:isficie)l rule of mecrecy.” If ao, it would be 7 ais; seible to ascertaic wtetner there ha: been an obstruction © justice ip thie mstter. VEIOEwe vate eeid, tmerefore, | ° \= 21 i168 Bis opimios that there 46 =o restriction an the Fa qu: <.i.riny of the jurors Who served St the Z¥ILLBAN case.- ae od » —_, ecopt of the FB] inquiry. partieularis in respect fo ey Eitk respect to the motion now pending before 3 WOSTENDYED, UWELOFNBURKER said that be is of the opinion esis that st this point the preseat fiaquiry beisg cocdacted gan cork, q)- have ac Beeriag on the mattar now pasding before SORTERDTER. 2 gn | WEIDENBUEFER anid be would be faciived to aveid falling (7! 2. WORTEXDYER at this point. Se hid Sis iaqelfy ds at Sock eM, a tim that it canoct Snfleeace the de Liberdt 3 ry . whe eat in early 1956 and no need exists $e gail it apes Ae to whetder er act 30 investigation at this net Jn | time woule Bare sey prejadicigi effec: op Sa fF guts of the the attention of the court. _ ge “pe ",t defendart im the aveat : the wet Ge, Tes WEIDEKBURNER said 2% mipht Juve gn gi fets Gm Figkte.ge the defendant; but he did aot think asty ourt a .siq Pave ~ would feel that it was “improperly prejedicial.” Se Re 9 | ' that logically acd reasomably the Lavestigation whould met .~ b deferred becauce ef the matter presently ponding before i: WORTENDTEE. He said he in edtiafied Chat that est opinion of the Department ef Justices who es dered. the fer. - F _* - 45 —_ * Oo January 306, 1869, AsFistant United States ¥ | A*svornes PREDELIC C, RITGER, JR, @avised that Be had cosabe tes | : -eneaich With respect to whetber or act Special Agests hetve’ astbority to adminieter oaths to Witnesses and other peracps _teterviewecs a6 this particular case. &SITGER advieed based . the pesults ef this research it was his opinion that és '718 particutar case Specie} Agents have authority oithis “c+ provision of Sectaun 93. Title 5, Urited States Code, - -adecnistes orcs to all perwone interviewsd. ” | ; f : | f |