Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Al Capone — Part 29
Page 70
70 / 80
te
ht
it
This can be fpnd while the
‘o in the.penitentiary, as tn
F
yeplerday, but througbe
their conduct af abe defense they -
Heated thar the case would be taken,
“if necemmary, to the Supreme court. 6
Appeals Court Ruling. - ‘
The opinion of the Cireult court wail
unanimous and it upheld Capone
convictlon on all of the five counts
eet up by che jury in tte verdict of
gulty. namely, willful attempts to
evade and defeat income taxes for th
veare 1925, 1926. and 1 and will
uilure to file Income tax returas for
ibe yearm 1928 and 1978.
Judges Bamuc! dlechuler, Evan -
Evsos, and Will M. @parks beard the
appeal and Judge &parks wrole the
opinion. which federal prosecutors
termed exhaustive and clear cut,
The merita of the defense copten«
Uona wera found by the Appellate
court to be at most technical, and
ibe errors relied upon. if conceded,
not wuffcient to affect the subetantial
ight of the defendant. . '
‘ The Defense Contentions. .
4a tbe uererse contended tha: the ime
ogy dictment wea phrased In the geners
terms of the statute and waa not
SuMcientiy particular te enable the
™, accused to prepare a proper defenad.
. t waa gle> conlended thet Capone
a culd have been treed twice for the
sume off)ense, had be been found not
aa EvUty on the evidence adduced at the
am fires cial _ ot
Judge Wilkerson erred, it ‘Wel
charged, In pot sumaining, Bra a
demurer to the indictmedt abd seo.
ond, a motion in arrest of Juégrent,
These were the only sesigenmentas oF
error, there being no attack oo the
auMiciancy of the evidence.
“Toletpreting these constl{ution
4 Provislona,” ald the Circuit oourt
» opinion, “ courte have quita generaliy |
held that where the offense ls parely
Statutory. having wo relation to fhe
common lew, it te, as & general raul
muficient in the indictment to chargé
(he Gefendant with acte coming fully
within the statutory description i
the substantial words of the statute t
An Essential of Indictment. i
™ “Bot jt is also tro that the @ee
cused must be apprised by the tm
7 dictment, with rassonablq certainty,
a sf the marvre of the accusation,
againat him, to the end that be may
" Prepore hus Geico wad plead # .
judgment as a ber to any subsequent e
+
SH prosecution for the same offense.”
The upinion pointed-out that the -
casey in Which |ndjctments bars ae
a attacked on thase constitutional §
“grounds are legion, that some hava,
“been beld good and gthers bed, de
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic