Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Al Capone — Part 32
Page 72
72 / 80
|
. pos ACRINST A REHEARING
SE ee je te PE a eee
ioage's Ex-Gang Chieftain 4s
2. Believed Likely to Gerve His .
Time at Alcatraz. —_
i
4 T"WASHINGTON, @ot. 16:—Prob-
ly the: last pVenue. through which
ae ine --Cupone ~ falght “Rave
“pecaped | “gerving . the rast of his
ten-year prison ~pentence “for ay
Bempted “evasion’ pf “income vax, |
1025 to 1827, was blocked to
teay by the Supreme Court.- -
Without explanation the court re-
fected @ petition of the former Chi- |
cago gang \eader for review of
Jower court findings, in a habeas
,Sorpus proceeding.
Counse] for Capone, conceding in-
‘come tax evasion charges, argued!
that as the indictment was drawn |
more than three years after the ‘al.
Jeged offenses occurred, the statute!
ef imitations barred the court
from taking jurisdiction.
. The action of the high sourt left
to Capone the sie recourse of an.
mppeai for a rehearing, a move in
which the odda would be against
. As a result Capone is likely
stay at Alcatraz prison at least
Gatil he becomes eligible for parole,
Since the court confined its ruling
to the essential point of the peti-
Hon, it threw no light on the ques-
fon whetbér counsel for Capone,
in appealing to the Court of Ap
from the decision of the Dis-
Court for Northern Niinois,
had erred In failing to raize the
Statute of limitations as a jegal
impediment to his trial
Besides the ten-year prison sen- |
tence, Capone received a year's’
term i in county jail and a fine of
At the trial, counsel. for Capone
asked the court to direct a verdict
of not guilty on the ground that
the statute of limitations prevented
jeonslideration of an offense three
years prior to the indictment. The.
vermment replied that In this case!
e tim tation vee six years because |
ttempt ’ Getraud” the
q alted Stated. * “
y. The. trial court Sverruled the mo-
for a directed verdict, On ap-
, reversal of the conviction was
ught on the gole ground of in-
clency #f the indictment and
Be question af tive statute of taal:
tions was sot ny ‘
|
. . —— j
Be. fhpecia: to ‘Tax Naw: Yoak, Traces. =
f-
e
7
ines ra A
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic