◆ SpookStack

TST entet Lr Stet ee cal VDT ATELY 4 —. hkowdae , 2h tac Aangusage of ‘the Buprenc tourt of Ponnay- Loe - Ivania in the Robort Clark casc,502 Pa.d2l: . eel eee . “anarchy will stalk in unnolosted" 4f individanls,"booause ~~» =>. “of superior oducation,agc,%r nontal rosoryation™ are to bo _ + pernitted to resist or to modify the laws of C gs - 8S -~-" " . agsorting to thoir own Individual boliofs, ote. (That was ’ , a naturalization easc, in which tho principle that ALBERT | EINSTEIN and hie affiiiatos nost sock to overthrow by “andividual resistance,” nancly tho power of povornnont to defond its oxistonce and onforco its laws by force of arns, was at issue as a “fundonental prinoeiplo" of tho United --- States Constitution,.}. oo ; ‘ i A { t i Again, this Einstoin thoory of in@ividusl opposition to tho nost fundanontal principle of all organized. govornnent, WEF was at fesuo in tho last naturalization onso Apejded dy - — { if i | ———tho Waitod Btatcs Suprenc Court. Tho Court said: "if tho attitude of this sininant...bo held inuaterial... where shall the linc be draw? Upon what ground of atinction nay wo horoaftor refoct another appiieant? —- «..There is no niddle crowd, If one quilification,of the oath he allowed, tho door 4s open for others, with | uttor confusion na the probable final result." (United States v¥.Oouglas Clydo Macintosh). - Ono of tho Aietionary definitions of anarchy is "utter disregard of governnent," - is. tobe baat Pad Ee doa et ed tut ow | What anarchist or communist has shown nore “uttor disregard €.°° 2° ‘- of governncnt"™ than ALBERT EINSTEIN in his appeals to fake... - individuals to enlist with hin in dllogal resista noo, to. teen their govornnents? oO of “eB. | “Another dictionary definition of anarchy ie "lowloss © © gh: iit. : sonfusion and disorder." i . e - “What anarchist or coxrmmist has promotod “lawless =|... confusion and disordor" in as mony difforont fiolds as ‘“* ° + ya ALBERT EINETEIN? : . ; a COMMUNIST PROGRAM FOR "SHATTERING" THE STATE an =. ; Tho negation of organized religion, tho abolition of -the -4 Church as woll as the State, are fundanontal objoctives of both anorchiste and sorrnnists. (Sco Tho State and Rovolue tion, By Nicolal Lonin, Chap.3,4 and &). - — a Contrary to pepular opinion, rte de no @ifforenco of viewpoint betwoon anarebiets oF ‘GPa ats on Choir we Witlinte eu moa 4, $no Wolition or) the ‘stato, Thoy differ. | only in the ‘+ geteay ala nothoris thoy mee achicvo on ae that eonnon gual. What the Corrmnists ebfost te anon the nanabhiets 45 (MMe Wwidd OM a thot thoy aro not rovolutionary enough in the opinion of _. 9: marke, Engels ané Lonin, to organize arnoa robollion to -.”. wee shatte fo IS OO O4O REE NH OE EE Ge ms gi a and destroy presont forns of governnont, | ate" pa. aa 0 establish, for o "tranaition poriod" a ruthless. "dictator && . ; ship of the prolotariat" which, ovontually, shall also . 3 "wither awn y." (Ibid.}. i4 .. LENIN says: "We do not at all disagroe with tho % Anarchiste on the qucstion of tho abolition of tho 6 State as a final ain." (Ipid.p.be). ~ oe "Tho AnarchisS idoo of the abolition of the State is 9 nudflod and non-revolution-ry.7.It is procisoly the 9 Rovolution,in its riso and developnont, with its spceifis ad problens in rolation to violonecc, authority, powor and OF the Stato, that tho Anarchists do not wish to sco."(Ibidsp.65). Likowise the official "Stratery of tho Commnistsa" doclares: "Tho Commmist Intornational has novor undervalued tho strongth and tho revolutionary will of tho anarchists-and syndica lists, who oro honostly fighting for tho froedon -~e