◆ SpookStack

of . r DO Ot ders oy ? AC La * ' _ wae 1 wr a PF meas frosty pinta kd Shot that the perthelion movenent 7 “Bicre are tro possiblities Tor this. Either, one invents snegtal. Mee berplanctary mosses which bre go large Bnd are distributes fr € Beh vances that they chow © merthel!an maveriert ike the one a 4.4e 4enctorcl’s a Hibhdy aicgaticfact ry wag mr coanared to the one @iven bo the thecry of relotivdity wich furnishes uy the perihelion vorement of “ereury witheutl axy other spectet orpumpbion. Cr clea, one refers te COTE" who ete oot titi the correct ternule for perihélian movement belere 7 ddde Newever, experts net only tered that CLNBEN's deduétions are teapiétel: trdne but that 4t 19 dmpesd 16 to obtain the forma ad a tondetuence of the udsizaptionk. cet Lerth by GOREN. Teererore Ur, Gtegedts wor’ is cerplétely worthless, a theerotte ccperinent whieh fatiea’, To secertained that th. -onersl theory of rclativity is the fairet true © dlancbien for the perthelicn usvenent cf Kercdry. Crigire Uy, T dla nob rebtltien Cour Ale wort because 2 did nob oer abovbh ab when Towrete vy work on the perdhclicn <whveriont ef Mercury, bob T would hove had eceasien to ~uutier it had IYrocn abont it. The pergonal atiteks, which tue “ossrs, - 7 ONE and LUNARU heve directed dgsine) me regarding thic clreunotarce, vo! _ ard ponerelly considered unfair by true experts. 2 felt it benceth re to mention aco} aterk this prior to nod, . ange p+ p . me WN OO “pe an = bs pa pee wom a br, G07 pormeitted thea roliabblity of toe tear ou cevpleted Unclish scocurerante bri the deflection of sui reys te appear 44 a wroer Jight ity mentioriay ently ond of the three dndependént prowps of photoarchhe which had to Rive false resulte a due te. dintortions of the heliostetie cirror, Ne stvprececd the ' fact thet the Fnclish cotromsaers Ueriselves poitited out in their official: roportc, that tho resdltc of their eypcrimentes rere a pridtient confiru tion of tha seneral theory ef r-letivitr, . . kr, @Y ¥ euporédsed, that dite edliected up to now on recedeflection di dhe cprtcbrim Ttner still contradicts ite:)£ ri that ¢ de inite celition of this matuc., de vtddi lacking, le mero ly mentones Vis witnesses orpose? to tie ec istence of the din- Geflection oredict.c ir the theors cf velotiviby bub he sunpresead ab throm: the lotcst dnvestigstic a hy ou OL, PUP sy and prone these feroor resi ts hove heen rohirs of toedr comedio iverecs.e “ ihe OTE | ‘és ~ aD ea sep . ay os es . . ? at ’ wom MR ae et ate as wt aa Tet eee te oe ee ae ed cae eee oe er oe a ne