◆ SpookStack

Rowan _ RINSTEINHITS VIEW 1 OF SOVIET EXPERTS Continued From Page 1 idesire for isolationiam may be,” iDr. Einstein added, “{t remaing no leas disastrous to Rusala and to all ‘other nations.” ; The Soviet acientists’ open letter -— ‘eriticizing Dr. Einstein was pub-|- ished in The New Times of Mos- cow on Nov, 26, 1947. Their action ‘Was reported in a Moscow dispatch ‘to The Associated Press published | ’ 1) THE NEW YoRK TIMES, .. The open letter was signed by|_ ‘Sergei Vavilov, president of the} ” ‘Academy of fclences of the!. U.S.8.3.;, A. N. Frumkin, director] . of the Cotlold-Electrochemicai In- stitute of the Academy, Moscow; A. F. Ioffe, director of the Physica- Cheinical Institute of the Academy, Leningrad, and N. N. Semyonov, director of the Institute of Chemi- ‘eal Phyaics of the Academy, Mos- cow. . so . Published by Atomic Scientists a fe et oe i” Dr, Einstein's reply ia published| ‘and the Soviet scientists’ open let- ‘ter reprinted in the February isaue of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, published by the Atomic Scientists of Chicago. _ In their letter the Soviet scien- ‘tists asserted that supporters of ‘¥world government" were “widely sing allegedly radical phrases to e effect that state pet ten Siesta e atom age has allegedly C {@ survival of old times.” . &. They attacked this on the ground ‘that such ideas were promoted at ‘the origin of the League of Na- ‘dons and that they represented dj SS ae Di. ity nat only over the armed forces} but also over all the channels of educatiqn and information 4s-well fa over the economic existence of} every single citizen. ‘ “I say this merely to in te that socialiam az auch cannof be considered the solution to - cial problems but merely aa a} framework within which mich solution is passible.” ae ‘the “imperialist” aims of "capl-|' 'talist monopolists.” Until the Bol-!: vik revolution Russia, they as- ‘serted, was dependent economically |’ and politically on “world capitalist monopolies.” ; Through the Bolshevik Revolu- tion Russia achieved independence, which its people defended in civil.): war battles “against a bloc of]. perialist statea” and, in the sec- ‘ascist invaders,” they argued. d World War, against “German|: “Now the advocates of a ‘world!: perstate’ invite ua to surrenderj' independence voluntarily in|: ithe name of a certain ‘world gov-|, jernment,' which, with a hig! ‘sounding trademark, con world domination of capital nee they declared. Idea of “Littl Assembiv” Hit