Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Alfred Kinsey — Part 2
‹
Page 1
1 / 38
; inflict any physical or serious psycho-
logical damage. The real problem now
becomes: By spending so much time
telling our children about the dangers
that surround every strange man, do
we perhaps do more harm than good?
My present associates at the Insti-
tute for Sex Research—John Gagnon,
the sociologist, and Cornelia Christen-
son, our curator—and I are firmly con-
vinced that lurid warnings are harmful;
we feel that they tend to encourage a
sort of paranoid fear of all strangers and
all men and even of life’s situations in
general, without really preventing any
significant number of these incidents.
We are confirmed in this belief by an-
other. fact shown by our new report:
The man who molests a child is usually
not @ stranger anyway. Like other
crimes, these happen most frequently
in the poorer neighborhoods, and the
offender is often a man who lives in the
same boarding house, or a neighbor or
friend of the family, sometimes even a
relative—someone whom the child
\ knows and trusts. The “lurking stranger”
is largely a myth.
I; young girls are overwarned, per-
haps older girls are not warned enough.
- Many of the older victims of rape, our
studies indicated, had actually invited
the attack—not knowingly, but through
ignorance of social] custom, particularly
of the customs of young men of a dif-
_ferent social class. For example, a 19-
year-old girl went to an amusement
park, missed her bus home and accepted
a ride from five young men who were
riding away from the park in an auto-
mobile. By the young men’s standards,
any gir] who got into the car with them
was openly offering herself for sexual
experience; so the minute she stepped
in, rape was inevitable. The young men
did not even think of the incident as
rape, even though she resisted; they be-
lieved that her resistance was just part
of the game! Another girl of 19 was
raped when she foolishly let four boys
give her a ride home from a party; a
girl of 14 was raped by a group of boys
who picked her up in an automobile and
got her drunk.
In some neighborhoods and small
communities, there happens to exist a
sort of unwritten law that accepting a
ride, particularly from more than one
young man, implies acceptance of
sexual relations. A girl who does not
know this—say, a college girl who her-
self comes from a well-behaved sub-
urban community but goes to another
town to visit one of her clasgmates— can
“QUTeRIY get into trouble.
{
THE 1965 KINSEY REPORT continued from page 67 |
ey, ——eee .
here is a whole range of questions |
which make the problem of rape a diffi-
cult one indeed. For years—perhaps
centuries—people have been arguing
whether a full-grown woman can be '
raped at all if she really wants to resist. ;
Among the skeptics, we found in the -
institute study, are many policemen and _
prosecuting authorities. A woman who
complains of rape is likely to meet with
a certain amount of suspicion, especially -
if, as so often nowadays, she turns out |
to be taller than the man she accuses. ;
But our interviews leave no doubt
about the answer to the old ques- ;
tion. One of the prisoners denied rather |
convincingly that he had used force;
however, when we checked his story}
we found that it had required fiv
titches to close the cut in the youn
woman’s lip. Another who denied using
force turned out to have been armed
with a kitchen knife; another with a
pistol. Certainly any woman who values
her life can be raped, no matter how
desperately she would like to resist.
There can also be no doubt, on the
_ other hand, that many men who have
gone to prison for rape did not use force;
they were more or less innocent victims
of circumstance. Sometimes the young
woman submitted willingly, and later,
conscience-stricken, changed her mind.
Sometimes, when the incident was dis-
covered, the woman claimed rape rather
than admit that she had taken part will-
ingly. This seems to happen especially
often in the case of a girl living at home,
whose parents find out that she has been
engaging in sexual activity.
There is also much room for difference
of opinion inherent in all the social cus-
toms of dating and courtship. According
to the rules, the man is supposed to be
the aggressor, the woman is supposed to
resist—or pretend to resist, At what point
are the woman’s protestations, which
she has been making all along, supposed
to be taken seriously? And how is the
man to know? It is a game fraught with
difficulties and danger. Sometimes a man
’ who ignores the protestations finds him-
self charged with rape or attempted
rape. Sometimes the man who listens
too politely is, in fact, alienating a young
lady who might have been the perfect
wife for him. This is one of the many
ironies of our sexual customs and laws—
a subject that will be considered in next
Se sell
Mont s Journal.
od
fe
semerme ot.
my . .
rapist—the man ith the
_knife or the pistol, the California man
‘who went on the prowl in his auto-
‘ mobile— is a dangerous, unfeeling man.
He regards women as mere objects, and
pays little attention to their physical
appearance or even age. Sometimes he is
a sadist, for whom inflicting physical
harm is an important part of his pleas-
ure, Yet, strangely, although he is
among the most unlovable of men, he
often exhibits a peculiar masculine van-
ity that leads to his undoing. Some rap-
ists we interviewed were in prison for
making this kind of mistake. In their un-
thinking way they assumed that the
woman enjoyed the experience. Some-
times such a man even suggested another
meeting. When the woman had the pres-
ence of mind to agree—and the rapist
showed up for the “date’—the police
were waiting. Otherwise he probably
would never have been caught.
In many ways the rapist represents an
extreme example of the difference be-
tween the masculine and feminine atti-
tudes toward sex—a difference that be-
came apparent in our earlier reports, and
that also proves to play an important
part in understanding sexual offenders.
One of the basic problems of our society
is the fact that the average man does not
understand the psychology and the feel-
‘ ings of the average woman, and the av-
i erage woman does not understand the
sexual drives and psychology of the
average man. In a sense, most sexual
offenders are men who have the usual
masculine misconceptions about the sex-
ual attitudes of women—but in an ex-
treme, exaggerated and distorted form.
In next month’s concluding installment
of this summary of our new report, I
shtatrexpitin this in detail, ~———_
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic