Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
American Friends Service Committee — Part 10
Page 35
35 / 140
52 PEAC ; VIETNA}
powers ‘except Laos and Cambodia. North Victnam indicated itse
receptive to this suggestion, as did France.!” The United State:
however, replied coldly, “There are no authorized negotiation
under way with Mr. Thant or any other government.” ?! U Thar
further drew upon himself the wrath of the United States govern
ment by saying, “E am sure that the great American people, }
only they knew the true facts and the background of the develop
ments in Vietnam, will agree with me that further bloodshed i
unnecessary.” |*
Hoping that the mere opening of negotiations might result in
tacit ceasefire, France urged thai neither the United Siates no
the People’s Republic of China make any preconditions to nego
tations." But Secretary Rusk said that the United States woul
agree to no conference until after North Vietnam had stopped th
flow of men and arms to the Vietcong.’4 Furthermore, he refuse:
to commit the Administration to any definite course, even i
North Vietnam agreed to end its support of the Vietcong.?> O:
February 27, the State Department published its widely dispute
White Paper in an effort to prove that this support was prepon
In February and early March 1965 the United States was begin
ning large-scale American-piloted combat missions against the Viet
cong in South Vietnam and massive air raids against North Viet
nam. These were no longer retaliation against specific provocativ
acts but were an avowed effort to punish North Vietnam unt
officials were willing to negotiate on terms acceptable to th
United States. At the same time, Secretary Rusk made it clear tha
the preconditions for any negotiations must be North Vietnam’
cessation of all aid to the Vietcong and an assurance that th
peace settlement would insure the “security and independence
of South Vietnam.’* This was interpreted in Vietnam to mea
*“ New York Times, February 26, 1965.
“ George E. Reedy, White House Press Secretary, as quoted by Max Frar
kel, New York Times, February 25, 1965.
* New York Times, February 25, 1965.
™* New York Times, February 26, 1965.
“Max Frankel, New York Times, February 26, 1965,
* Drew Middleton, New York Times, February 25, 1965,
* New York Times, February 26, 1965.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic