◆ SpookStack

¥ challenge to her conviction is that the evidence offered at trial was insufficient to support the jury's conviction on Count 1.6 The district court had jurisdiction over the criminal proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231. We have _ jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review of a sufficiency of the evidence challenge is guided by strict principles of deference to a jury's verdict. United States v. Anderskow, 88 F.3d 245, 251 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 117 Ss. Ct. 613 (1996). We must view the | evidence in the light most favorable to the government and must sustain a jury's verdict if "a reasonable jury believing 4. Rosario was also ordered to pay restitution in the amounts of $2,996.00 and $1,934.00 to the victims and to pay aggregated special assessments of $50.00. 5. That statute provides: In all cases of conviction by a United States magistrate an appeal of right shall lie from the judgment of the magistrate to a judge of the. district court of the district in which the offense was committed. 18 U.S.C. § 3402. | http://vis.law.vill.edu/locator/3d/July1997/97a1636p.htm Page 8 of 29 5/10/2005