Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 29
Page 24
24 / 123
FD-302a (Rev? 10-6-95)
279A-WF-222936| _—| 302 .
Continuation of FD-302 of BRUCE EF. IVINS ,On 02/12/2003 __,Page 3
The Dugway material has been kept in the cold room in B3
since it was received in 1997. There is a record of how much
material was initially received as well as how much has been
removed and where it went. IVINS thinks that all of the Dugway
material has been stored with his lab group and kept in the two
original flasks it was placed in. Each flask initially had 500
milliliters of wet spore preparation, and only one flask of
material remains. IVINS advised that 1 milliliter or less of the
Dugway material could be taken and it wouldn't be missed.
Double purified material needs to have a chromatogram
done to determine whether it was run through a gradient. A trace
of the gradient would remain on the material and should be
indicated by a peak on the chromatogram. Some possible gradients
include sucrose, hypaque, renografin (which became known as renocal
but may not be manufactured any longer), or phycoll.
IVINS did the following calculation estimates to
determine how much of the Dugway spores would have been missing if
they had been used in the anthrax mailings. 2.0-2.5 grams of
material were present in each letter with a 10°/mL spore
concentration. In order to achieve that spore concentration,
80-100L of runs would have been necessary and approximately 300mL
of the Dugway material would have been required. This amount of
missing material would have been noticed.
IVINS thinks that most of the people at USAMRIID use
broth to grow B.a., although he can't say for certain how everyone
else there grows their spores. Although B.a. can be grown on agar,
nicer spores are produced in broth, and they can be purified more
easily and are "hotter". If one needs to purify more than a very
small amount of B.a., it is difficult to use agar as you would need
numerous plates.
Spores grown up on agar are dirtier than broth grown.
IVINS does not know if this is because the spores pick up debris
from the agar or if there are media components on the surface of
the spore. No matter how agar grown spores are washed, some agar
always remains on the spores.
The protocol that IVINS used to grow B.a. is the same one
published in the paper titled "Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine
in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by
Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin". bé
IVINS,[ _fand several other USAMRIID scientists co-authored bIc
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic