Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Animal Mutilation — Part 4
Page 25
25 / 27
=
CATTLE MUTILATIONS
Watters Be Pars Midenemtane af 2th re don ~_
DAVID PERKINS, Director or the Department cf Research
at Libre School in Farasita, Colorado, exhibited a map of the
United States which contained hundreds of cclored pins identifying
mutilation sites. He commented that he had been making a
systematic collection of data since 1975, and has never met
a greater challenge. He said, “The only thing that makes sense
4 . about the mutilations is that they make no sense at all.”
ae TOM ADAMS of Paris Texas, who has been independently
meet examining mutilations for six years, said his investigation
ae has shown that helicopters are almost always observed in the
we area of the mutiliations. He said that the helicopters do
. not have identifying markings and they fly at abnormal, unsafe,
er illegal altitudes.
fe Dr. PETER VAN ARSDALE, Ph.D., Assistant Professor,
i Department of Anthropology, University of Denver, suggested
that those investigating the cattle mutilations take a systematic
approach and look at ali types of evidence is discounting any
of the propounded theories such as responsibility by extraterr stri
visitors or Satanic cults.
RICHARD SIGISMUND, Social Scientist, Boulder, Colorado,
presented an argument which advanced the theory that the cattle
mutilations are possibly related to activity of UFOs. Numerous
other persons made similar type presentations expounding on
their theories regarding the possibility that the mutilations
are the responsibility of extraterrestrial visitors, members of
Satanic cults, or some unknown government agency.
Dr. RICHARD PRINE, Forensic Veterinarian, Los Alamos
Scientific Laboratory (LASL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, discounted
the possibility that the mutilations have been done by anything
but predators. He said he had examined six carcasses and in
his opinion predators were responsible for the mutiliation of
all six.
Dr. CLAIRE HIBBS, a representative of the State
Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, New Mexico State University,
Las Cruces, New Mexico, said he recently came to New Mexico,
but that prior to that he exanfined some mutiliation findings
in Kansas and Nebraska. Dr. HIBBS said the mutiliations fell
-into three categories: animals killed and mutilated by predators
and scavengers, animals mutilated after death by “sharp instruments
and animals mutilated by pranksters.
soe pe
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic