◆ SpookStack

PaGE TWO ATKID AFFIANT FOR ABOVE WAnnAWTS. DURING QUESTIONING BY DEFENSE COUN- SEL MARY WELCOME, CHIEF REDDING WAS SPECIFICALLY ASKFD IN A SERIES OF INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS AS TO WHY SO MANY OF THE VICTIMS* NAMES WERE MENTIONED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. REDDING WAS COMMITTED TO REPLY THAT IT WAS THE DETERMINATION OF THE INVESTIGATION THAT HE IN FACT WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF THOSE VICTIMS INNUMERATED THEREIN. THE ABOVE STATEMENT NOW MAKES A MATTER OF COURTROOM RECORD THE LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSUMPTION THAT THE SUBJECT, ALTHOUGH NOT UMEROUS HOMICIDES, IS CONSIDERED FOR ALL THCSE WHEREIN FIBER EVIDENCE HAS BEEN OPTAINED. PRESIDING JUDGE CLARENCE COOPER WILL RULE ON TODAY*S MOTION MOST PROBABLY ON 10/21/81. ASSISTANT FULTON COUNTY DA MILLE® WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE IN A CONFERENCE WITH (RMB Lap, as TO FEASIBILITY OF WORKING UP ALL OF THE FIBER EVIDENCE OBTAINED DURING THE ENTIRE INVESTIGATION AND CURRENTLY ON DEPOSIT AT THE GEORGIA CRIME LAB. MILLER INDICATES THAT UNDER STATE LAW, IT IS POSSIBLE TO SHOW TTFRANS AP ERPHAUTIOR WHICH aac oo oe Ww av a mmvs ay wil NOTCATE A CPHEME way mack A OL an T ha a “The ae AIC.