◆ SpookStack

\" _ 14. Is there any internal investigation underway of possible FB1 misconduct? If such an jnternal review is complete, yarn any problens discovered? There is no iatecos! jnavestiaqation undarway porteaining fiije FR] misconduct" concerning th: investigation of If the Renater is Bing and mur dares hed lelron a St Ccrid far ert ‘4 4 aware of any reason that such an investigation should be conducted, Nhe is requested to provide whatever information he Posseeres to the FRI, ca t) i] i] 0 0 15. Was tha investigation of Mr. Williams, cupucially the Oecurrences immediately following the incident st the bridge, lege than «a first rate job in your estimation? No * 1G. ik you think IL was appropriate for the FRY to proses for an eit arrest in the case before loos] prosecutors £ Ky June 3, 1981, dt was spparent that Wayne hh. Williams had determined hr was under surveillance and, thorafore, aearch warrants obtained by the FRI from state court judges were executed andl Witliams wage interviewed at the Atlanta PHI office. Prosent at the orfies during this period of time were the twa Asnigtant U. S. Attorneys ansignod to the case who wire kapt abreast Gl 4] developments. iL was) their opinion at that Lime that eufficient evidence criated to arrest Willjams for the Murder af Nathaniel Cater and that had thie killing possesscd federal jurisdiction, they would have: authorized game on that datas, In the subsequent thriins weeks, surveillance was maintained ‘on Williams ta inaure that no turther individuale fall victim to him, with Wiljioms, of courae, recognizing the fact he was under gurveillance. This led to protractad, high spoed driving in # rookless fashion Lhroughout the city of ALlanta by Williame, jeopardizing net only Williams and the surveil lling agents stu police officers but citizens as well. Furthermore, had williams baun able to lose the surveillance, there is every raasan to believe he would have returned to killing Atlanta area youths. 17. Finally, 4 hiqh Jevel official on the Epocial Yask Force was qguaked in the New York Times last July as asying, "The Fel want to solve the case themselves. They wanted all the orcdit, but instead they have made it More djfficult to regolve the quilt or innocence of the suspect". Whab can we do and what can youl do te minimize the rivalries, which can digruptl investhigestions, if the Federal Government ia going to get involved more heavily in crimes, which in the past have besn Jett to state and laczal authorities? i