Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Atlanta Child Murders — Part 24
Page 59
59 / 145
AT 7A~1835
a prominent public posture when they would have preferred to remain
in a more subordinate role. Of course, some of these hard feelings
have been diminished by the successful outcome of the trial.
Moreover, this additional effort will reach every member
of Mr. Slaton's prosecutive staff, who played a primary role in the
prosecution of Wayne Williams.
w® 1) Lewis Slaton, District Attorney
Slaton had the overall responsibility for prosecuting
the Wayne Williams case. In addition, Slaton actively participated
in examininc witnesses and forming stratagems. He was also the
final speaker during the closing arguments where he reminded the
jury of many salient points brought out during the trial. As
Mentioned previously, Slaton has received a telephone call from
the Director commending him for his efforts in this matter.
we? 2) Jack Mallard, Assistant District Attorney
Mallard was the individual responsible for a good portion
of the examination of numerous prosecution and defense witnesses,
In addition, his effective cross-examination of Wayne Williams was
one of the vital points in the trial.
ye 3) Gordon Miller, Assistant District Attorney
: Miller was responsible for introducing the fiber and
technical evidence. Miller became very knowledgeable regarding
fibers and hydrology and effectively introduced these aspects of
the State's case to the jury. In addition, Miller examined
different pathologists placed on the witness stan@ by the pro-
secution. Miller's participation in the closing arguments was
‘extremely important, as his summation of the fiber evidence helped
the jury focus on the strength of this evidence.
Lens 4) Wallace Speed, Assistant District Attorney
Speed was instrumental in interviewing key rebuttal
witnesses. In addition, Speed gathered information pertaining to
documentation which proved the Williams family purchased the green
carpeting in 1971. Speed also participated in court by placing
on the witness stand the individuals who contracted with the
Williams family for carpeting and who installed same. Speed also
assisted the prosecution in forming various stratagems. 5
-?2- t
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic