◆ SpookStack

dent for this proce” 2: in court history. The :ision to establish a pattern and make J. cases fit a mold in view “_f the critical nature of the case is indeed an unfit decision. If anything, a pat- tern, having been established, should be used merely as a point of departure for a trial by jury in each and every case. To date, there has been no attempt to learn the identity of the mass murderer(s) of our children. For this reason, we are concerned that we may never know the circumstances surrounding our children's deaths. Questions abound in every area of the situation. Essentially, Mr. Reynolds, I believe that the civil rights of the children and parents have been violated for the following reasons: 1) Testimony given by Mr. A-~-a white male witness who alleges that other white persons have "bragged" to him about killing "them damn niggers." I am in possession of taped recordings detailing the contents of his testimony. 2) Testimony given by Mrs. B--a white female witness who reports that an acquaintance is killing the children to hide his homosexual activity with the boys. Mrs. B has detailed her observa- tions in a written report and submitted it to me. 3) Testimony given by Mr. C-~-a young black male (16) whom I consider a survivor because of hisS narrow escape with death. Mr. C describes his homosexual prostitution activities with white males in Northside Atlanta. His tape recorded testimony describes the activities of a club of members which included two of the victims. by police officials at every level of the crisis: i.e., delayed action early on; insensitive and improper police procedures;--all of which were tolerated because victims were black and not white. 5) In many instances, citizens desiring to offer information were either discouraged or ignored in their attempt to cooperate with investigative authorities. Even parents’ offer of information was often ignored or simply refused. 6) The court's failure to issue supeona to persons known to have had continuous contact with many victims (based on eye-witness accounts as opposed to fiber evidence) is also contrary to proper - judicial procedure. As a matter of information, court documents, depositions, and other testimony provide identities of such persons. The following discussion attempts to elaborate on the reasons listed ove. “Mr. A--A White Male Witness On August 14, 1982, at his request, I visited the home of a middle- aged white male in Atlanta (hereafter referred to as Mr. A) who gave a comprehensive accounting of the implementation of a calculated plan by whites to kill the black children. An excerpt from that conversa- an tion follows: hy 4) Parents were subject to indecent and indifferent treatment