Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Atlanta Child Murders — Part 24
Page 96
96 / 145
dent for this procedure in court history. The decision to establish
& pattern and make all cases fit a mold in view of the critical
nature of the case is indeed an unfit decision. If anything, a pat-
tern, having been established, should be used merely es a point of
departure for a trial by jury in each and every case.
To date, there has been no attempt to learn the identity of the mass
murderer(s) of our children. For this reason, we are concerned that
we may never know the circumstances surrounding our children's deaths.
Questions abound in every area of the situation.
Essentially, Mr. Reynolds, J believe that the civil rights of the
children and parents have been violated for the following reasons:
1} Testimo iven by Mr. A--a white male witness who alle
that other white persons have "bragged" to him about killing "them
damn niggers.” I am in possession of taped recordings detailing the
contents of his testimony.
n 4 W a
Tr 1
‘Sd
2) Testimony given by Mrs. B--a white female witness who
reports that an acquaintance is killing the children to hide his
bomosexual activity with the boys. Mrs. B has detailed her observa-
tions in a written report and submitted it to me.
3) Testimony given by Mr. C--a young black male (16) whom I
consider a survivor because of his narrow escape with death. Mr. C
describes his homosexual prostitution activities with white males
in Northside Atlanta. His tape recorded testimony describes the
activities of a club of members which included two of the victims.
4) Parents were subject to indecent and indifferent treatment
by police officials at every level of the crisis: i.e., delayed
action early on; insensitive and improper police procedures;--all of
which were tolerated because victims were black and not white.
5) In many instances, citizens desiring to offer information
were either discouraged or ignored in their attempt to cooperate with
investigative authorities. Even parents' offer of information was
often ignored or simply refused.
6} The court's failure to issue supeona to persons known to
bave had continuous contact. with many victims (based on eye-witness
accounts as opposed to fiber evidence) is also contrary to proper
judicial procedure. As a matter of information, court documents,
depositions, and otber testimony provide identities of such persons.
The following discussion attempts to elaborate on the reasons listed
above.
Mr. A--A White Male Witness ‘
On August 14, 1982, at his request, I visited the home of a middle-
aged white male in Atlanta (hereafter referred to #s Wr..A) who gave
a comprehensive accounting of the implementation Of a calculated plan
by whites to kill the biack children. An excerpt from that conversa-
tion follows: a a oe
+i resis Pe ne
Doe me
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic