Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bertolt Brecht — Part 3
Page 47
47 / 90
rey
te aS
DIRECTOR, FBI July 17, 1952.5"
thi
leanings. The informant advised that ;
has indicated that BRECHT was the thirteenth smong ths top
Hollywood Communists investigated the House Unamerican
Activities Committee. hae further
stated that while the play has no open Communist features
it does tend to be strongly socialistic and for this reason
the film has never been produced commercially either as a
stage play or as a wovie in this country, although it is
considered by the Grama critics to be an outstanding work
of art. The film in question is the only known production
330 work and was made in Germany sotetime in 1949 end
1 e
_ The informant advised that ery expressed -
some doubt as to the validity to 8 statements
since originally stated in a long distance call from
Chicago to that Warner Brothers was involved in sone
litigation and could prove their point only by ence con-
tained in this particular copy of this fila.
reported that subsequently when personally
interviewed him in Urbana concerning the fiim no mention was
ea of a litigation referred to in the telephone conversation,
reportedly told hat the special character~
istics in this particular copy of the film were extra words
"dubbed in" to the sound tract, which taken separately mean /
nothing but when considered as a group comprise some sort cf:
secret message. @UMENENB inferred that this film had been — |,
uged in some sort of international espionage situation many ‘
years ago. He did not specify what the exact words were or
how Warner Brothera became aware of the changes, but stated
that because of these changes 1t was company policy to "never*
loan that fila out.
The informant who le generally familiar with subversive and
‘- disloyal activities among atudent and faculty personnel at
the University of Tllino vised that he knows of no such
activity by a of the Speech Department.
The informant stated that the circumstances surrounding the
_ showing of ids film were that because of the art valu
. the f41 was Gesirous of securing a co
.. th§@ film for the festival of contemporary arta inl
held at the University, but inasmuch as she was unable
. se@eure the copy in time for the festival a separate showing
of this fila was arranged under the auspiceses of the Speech
Departaent at the University,
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic