Billy Carter — Part 3

50 pages · May 08, 2026 · Document date: Jun 4, 1980 · Broad topic: Politics & Activism · Topic: Billy Carter · 49 pages OCR'd

← Back to feed

‹

AT 97-106 2 explained that he was not particularly impressed with Levine and Meltz as Goldkist is often approached by various people offering to deliver huge sales to Goldkist in exchange for an agency relationship. Golidkist, with only a 61C couple of exceptions, does not become involved in these agency relationships and certainly not before some demonstration is made that the persons proposing the agency relationship can deliver. Goldkist attorneys examined an "Exclusive Agency Agreement" offered by Levine and Meltz, setting up Worldwide Trading Corporation as the Agent of Goldkist. The agreement has the title Worldwide Trading Corporation marked through and inserted the title "Robert Schwint Enterprises, Inc., a Caymen Island Corporation to be founded" written in. Goldkist attorneys found several problems with the agreement and it was never executed. No sales were generated by Levine and Meltz to the Libyans on behalf of Goldkist. stated that Goldkist also had contact with fre Levine and Meltz in two other proposed deals where Levine and Meltz were attempting to sell Agri products to Taiwan and Germany. Neither of these deals materialized. Gs << available the Goldkist file on Levine at and Meltz-. orrespondence in the file started in October, 1975, 6 and related primarily to proposals by Levine and Meltz in relation to possible sales to Taiwan and Germany. Copies of the Exclusive Agency Agreement; a memo fron qa Ea» dated January 10, 1979, and an attached erary; handwritten notes a relating to the Libyan BIC proposal made by Levine and Meltz; two memorandums, dated January 26, 1979, and January 31, 1979, relating to the analysis of the Libyan a . letter, dated March 20, 1979, fron i <° the which served as a letter of introductio for Worldw. rading Corporation, were obtained from the file. GREE «2128 that although the letter does not appear in e tile, he vaguely r ring a letter similar to the copy of the letter to the for Levine 67% and Meltz to the Libyan Government. at the preparation of this type of letter is common practice for Goldkist. He pointed out that the letter does not bind Goldkist in any manner, and if the bearer of the letter actually makes

›

AT 97-106
2

explained that he was not particularly
impressed with Levine and Meltz as Goldkist is often approached
by various people offering to deliver huge sales to Goldkist in
exchange for an agency relationship. Golidkist, with only a 61C
couple of exceptions, does not become involved in these agency
relationships and certainly not before some demonstration is made
that the persons proposing the agency relationship can deliver.

Goldkist attorneys examined an "Exclusive Agency
Agreement" offered by Levine and Meltz, setting up Worldwide
Trading Corporation as the Agent of Goldkist. The agreement
has the title Worldwide Trading Corporation marked through and
inserted the title "Robert Schwint Enterprises, Inc., a Caymen
Island Corporation to be founded" written in. Goldkist attorneys
found several problems with the agreement and it was never
executed. No sales were generated by Levine and Meltz to the
Libyans on behalf of Goldkist.

stated that Goldkist also had contact with fre
Levine and Meltz in two other proposed deals where Levine and

Meltz were attempting to sell Agri products to Taiwan and Germany.
Neither of these deals materialized.

Gs << available the Goldkist file on Levine at
and Meltz-. orrespondence in the file started in October, 1975, 6

and related primarily to proposals by Levine and Meltz in relation
to possible sales to Taiwan and Germany.

Copies of the Exclusive Agency Agreement; a memo fron
qa Ea» dated January 10, 1979, and an attached

erary; handwritten notes a relating to the Libyan BIC
proposal made by Levine and Meltz; two memorandums, dated January 26,
1979, and January 31, 1979, relating to the analysis of the

Libyan a . letter, dated March 20, 1979, fron i <°
the which served as a letter of introductio
for Worldw. rading Corporation, were obtained from the file.

GREE «2128 that although the letter does not
appear in e tile, he vaguely r ring a letter similar

to the copy of the letter to the for Levine 67%
and Meltz to the Libyan Government. at the
preparation of this type of letter is common practice for

Goldkist. He pointed out that the letter does not bind Goldkist

in any manner, and if the bearer of the letter actually makes