◆ SpookStack

- .~ € © ® z, S x 5 Assistant Attorney General Internal Security Division whether or not the Bureau conducted electronic surveillance of these leaders and whether or not the State's evidence resulted from a Bureau electronic surveillance. The judge was previously advised orally that none of the State's evidence in this case was the product or result of an electronic surveillance conducted by the Bureau. This matter was coordinated with the Department by a representative of the Office of Legal Counsel and Domestic Intelligence Division. Above letter confirms discussions held concerning this matter. ‘ age TE TE > Pe VOLE oes Di ei tage “way -= 2 = re ra. ee ae. * mae . ae * ~ . - - birth tere ides pak telat te HEE Oe EP OR CES RL LSS yee Loe re WIE Re Pe Ree wes er pres wei Brel As hed a ele ot a 4 a ke Ae be ok oo iy a Se a er ro Bae ESTE tage ek SUT e ee ee CC ay ee . pS o be hard : oe Oe ee Basil, . Se nf ¢ . be Stic th is + CORRE | 1 ON TC cca EI ARETE ren TN hae Whe aid . . a ae! OY rar eae oO 37 so . PA res, 7 a ee o a see nM eG ee _ et BESS EEER AE e Nr . % “: . . ’ ld . Ft . rag 7 oe Fs me oe NE “ ee nF aie SS a Pet? ta f ADS ON ae