◆ SpookStack

furnish on behalf of the builders of the Miamingo Hotel a letter, sta e t that they could proseed with oonstruction and that as a result of this letter these people have invested a large sum of money in this ct. That objection would be answered by showing that the statement ho made sf. at the “permission” granted was based on the false representation In so far as the objection that these individuals hawe invested a large sum of money is concerned, that can be ' answered by point N "BUGS" SIEGEL has never engaged in honest toil and tha in so far as present information sows does not legitimately have ava e the iarge sum of money so far spent in the construction of the Flamingo Hotel. INDICATIONS OF GUILT WHICH ARE NOT EVIDENCE C.P.A. hearing at San Francisco discussed Iya in the hotel room at the Saint Franois Hotel a ility that perjury had been committed before the C.P.A. Commissioner. ore the C.P.A. heari ugust 13 and 1) IEGEL was in bx touch wi oO Bee ye “get to" the Commissioner, who was to hear 8 matter. This wo appear to be unnecessary if SIEGEL and his agsooiates had not violated the C.P.A. regulations. ust isoussed ~ a ‘lilly of 2900.00 on e Flamingo Hotel. During his conversatio stated, “We have a single- story building of lattice steel of approximately 55,000 square feet which hb? houses the restaurant, bar kitchen and casino. The cost of this is estimated t 0,000.00 exclusive of furnishings.” Later in the same conversation, aid, "Then we have a three-story and penthouse hotel buiiding, ro of 55,000 square feet of re-enforced concrete, That building is going to cost us approximately $770,000.00 without any furnishings".