Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bugsy Siegel — Part 19
Page 58
58 / 98
Q 4
Ios Angeles, California error CONTAIRED
September 16, 1946 aL 1NFOR ED
Tha
—_—T
Re: BENJAMIN “BUGS” SIEGEL
MISCELLANEOUS; INFORMATION CONCERNING 5
GRIME SURVEY
At 9:50 a.m. on September 14, 1946 I spoke ~ fD
at the Bureau in the absence of Assistant Director ROSEN. I asked h
if he had reviewed the San Francisco teletype of September 13, 1946 and he
said that he was aware that the Government had lost the casa before the
C.P.A. Commissioner in San Francisco. I 8 question now
is whether this matter can be re-opened See that
perhaps the doctrine of res adjudicata would apply, but I told him that
I did not believe this since the proceedings before the Commissioner IC
are not legal proceedings and are subject to review by the courts. _*
I suggested, however, that this matter be discussed with the department,
I pointed out that according to the VARIETY newspaper a case in Seattle
had been handled by the Mhited states Attorney order
stopping the construction of a $100,000 theatre andi—_-a.ske
what the details of this were and I said that because
VARIETY carried a very small] article about ‘ial coc out
that it would probably be very difficult to esta @ case at this
point in view of the fact that the matter had been fully aired before a
C.P.A. Commissioner, J stated that undoubtedly it would be a difficult
case but that I could see no harm in at least conducting the investigation;
that possible fraud in connection with the Flamingo Hotel is the only
Federal violation that we have except the narcotic matter in Mexico,
which is not under our jurisdiction, T said that ft would like the
Bureau's decision as soon as possible because the time element is important
since construction of the hotel is going forward and we may find ourselves
in the position of eventually going into court on this matter and having
the defendants state that the hotel is practically finished so why
ake ee a ene = gta —
should the government now try to stop them.
a
I tol that our principal purpose in desiring
to go ahead with 8 investigation is to stop the hotel, if possible,
and secondly to trace_back the money which has gone into the construction )9¢
of the hotel. I told hat it would be necessary to conduct “
an open investigation o 8 matter because we can no longer investigate
discrestly; that we have conducted all of the discreet investigation
that is posgible, and the matter is not/at | the pod at ere We Must open ye 95
interviag yarious individuals beginning a
ei. .;.:2.::2 that I submit a memorandum to urea con ng
\
stem
ar
f
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic