Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 12
Page 67
67 / 86
How long had thez
been passin,
|Britain’s secrets td
Soviet Russia ?
PPETROV declares they were
signed up by Soviet in-
telligence services while still
“at Cambridge, 1T¢ is irpe that
both were then ardent Com-
munists, But so were thousands
of other jiberal-mindeq young
men who turned. to “Com-
‘munism in the dark days of
{ne mid-thirties siripiy be:
cause they considered it the
best way of fishting Faseism,
When Hitler was defeated,
most Of them forgot all about
Communism, Why should
Russian agents have selected
just these two from a! the
other university Cotamurists
who have since beeome. irre-
proachable ‘citizens — and
patriots? And what use could
they have been before tev
haq even decided what their
carer would be?
&O IJ think Donald Mac.
jean was approached much
later, when he was First
Secretary to the British
Embassy at Washington,
around 1846, when he was in
a position ta provide valuable
information and was suffi-
ciently opposed to British and
merican policy to believe
that he was helping the cause
of world peace by doing so.
How was it that he
ieas.not suspected
earlier Poo”
NE of the most disturbing
aspects of this dreadful
affair 18 that Donald Maclean
was allowed such a long run.
In his drunken moments he
was by no mesns careful,
eitger in speech or action, and
often declared that he was a
Sofiet agent. Did none of his
frignds or colleagues at leust
sugpect that he was betraying
hig teust? Lf they did, why
wt
did they not report hifn to
their superiors? If the dic
report him, why was no action
luken.?
How thorough were
the investigations ?
A SENIOR official of MLLS
é told me just before the
News Chronicle serialised my
book* last year that his service
had been warning the Foreion
Office about Maclean “far
some time” before his fight.
Nia did not say what the
Warnitig was about It could
simply have been of Maclean’s'
behaviour, which was entirely
unsuitible for a senior Forefgn
Service official,
But if the suspicion was by
then of something far praver,
how was it. that he was able
to evade ALI5’s net.? He was
conspicugusly tall and easy to
keep whder observation if! for
example, he wag meeting hig
Russian contact in a pub qr a
bar to. hand over Fordien
Olfice documents,
Even when the game wa: up
and he had flown, b diy
Melinda, his American-born
wife, and her mother, Mus,
Dunbar, told me that the
Mmvestigatoers whe hurried
Gown to-"Beaconshaw, his
hotse at Tatsheld, when he
Was repdried missing, did not,
trouble to examine the mass
. Of papers-he-left behind, Vet
by the it must have been
apparent that he was a. spy. '
’
How much did
Melinda know ?
TPuERE is now a suggestion
that Melinda, who follawed
Donald into exile with Wher
three children 27 months later,
* *The Missing Macleans, phib-
Ushed by Cassell and Ca., Lid.
at 12s. td. net,
knew all the time that her hug-
baha was a Sdviet agent, antl
was Indeed a Communist het
f that is true, and without
definite hard evidence I can-
not believe that it is, then she
Was a superb actress, F knew
Melinda well,
Although. it Is evident that
sometime between Dona'd’s
disappearance and her fligtt
from Geneva sha had heen
told what he was doing—and
for inexplicable reasons of her
own had accepted the posi-
tion and agreed to go. ta him
—~i any still sure she was the
simple, rather frivolous sirl
with no political interests,
whatever she appeared. It
was not only to me that she
gave this impression, but to
many others of her friends—-
jacluding girl friends who
miicht have had a mbre
efitical approach.
What was Burgess's
role?
MPHE White Pauper speciiic-
ally mentions Donald
Maclean as “the principal
suspect” in a leakage of infor-
mation 10. the Russians. It
states that Burgess's
behaviour was unsatisfactory,
but there is nd suggestion that
He Was in any way implicated
in passing information,
It is alsa stressed. that there
is no evidence of any
abnormal or suspicions con-
tact between the two men so
that were one suspected the
other would. aittomatically
come under suspician,
Were they in fact the team
they have all along been sup-
posed os they fled together ?
r Were they acting separately
as Soviet agents, and only
Wrought together by he
yecessity of getting them bth
ut of Englang at the sdme
me? it is an imporjant
point, ;
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
pigs operation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic