Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 13
Page 32
32 / 86
‘a
oa
Meee
i"a@ bit puzzled” by the reply. “If Lord .
“Rpading maintains that it is strictly acer.
1age to Say that Mr Maclean performed ‘Jis -
ofic‘al duties satisfactorily up to the ddte
of his disappearance—we know now that
. Was: Under grave suspicion and s
being watched as a suspected Spy apart
from his other record—~the public, which
does not’ understand these niceties,: is
bound to ask whether there may not be
other officials who are ilely oat their
official duties in a similarly satisfactory
manner. ; — } .
» DLerd. Reading said that when {fn his
original statement. he said Maclean had
discharged his official duties satisfactorily
that. it referred, in the context, to his
appointment as head of the Americay
. Department and the duties he hed been
called upon to carry out, “In tact, a very
experienced under-secretary who er
vised the department was watching him
with special closeness towards the end of
the time before his disappearance, just to
see Whether there was anything which indi-
cated that Mr Maclean was not performing
his duties satisfactorily at that mome
and he came to the conclusion that the
as nothing to which exeeption could
ken.
Lord Jowitt. Leader of the Oppositign
ers: If it was known at the time thit.
fis man was under suspicion at the dale
oI his’ disappearance. would it not have -
-been better to say sa Untesg public interest
demanded that it should be kept quiet 7
.. Lord Reading: I knew at he time I
3 made the answer—of course I did, there
is ne question of the department holding -
anything back from me at any time-—that
Mr Maclean had been under investigation. -
Tt. was not relevant to the question asked.
I wag satisfed at the time. while investi-
gations were still proceeding, that it was
not in the public Interest to disclose more
than I actually disclosed. I-am still
-satished that is the case. .. ;
Lard Vansittart asked if it was now
realised that “some of us who have given
qur lives io this great service are pro-
‘foundly sad at heart that it has been
; sullied by the retention of a_notorigus
drunk after his exploits in Cairo were
known, and how hotly I repudiate the
. aspersions .that in some quarters have
been thrown on the service as a whold” ?
Lord Astor asked if there would be an
- oweun, pportunity of debating the White Paper, -
Lord Reading said if the House wanted
. debate the vernient was perfectly
pppfenared to have one. | ee
a F a a
.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic