◆ SpookStack

a em | frm . a ay la eA Soan te lai pean oem SE ae a » we bane peter ant sim cone ees ames % } | do iF a ¥ €QO.3 a7 b Wr FE BR ES Swe aN (Continued From Page 37) iven as the Hotel Central. Zurich. wiss authorities could not identi- fy Mr. Becker, Probably the name was false. “Shortly after the receipt of thiese bank drafts Mrs. MacLean received a letter in her husband's handwriting. It had been posted in Reigate, Surrey on Aug. 5, 1951, and was of an affectionate, personal ra- ture as from husband to wife, It gave no clue as to Mr. MacLean's whereabouts or the reason for his disappearance but it explained fhat the bank drafts, which for con- venience had been sent to Mrs. Dun- bar, were intended for Mrs. Mac- Lean. “Lady MacLean received a further letter from her son on Aug. 15, 2951. ‘There is no doubt that it was in his own handwriting. It had ‘been posited at Herne Hill on Aug. 22... “On Sept. 11, 1953, Mrs, MacLean, who was living in Geneva. left there by car with her three children. She had told her mother, who was stay: ing with her, that she had unex: pectedly come across an acquaint- ance who she and her husband had previously known in Cairo, and that he had invited her and the children to spend the week-end with him at Territet, near Montreux, She stated that she would return to Geneva on Sept. 13 in time for the two elder children to attend school the fol- lowing day. “By Sept. 14 her mother, alarmed at her failure to return, reported the matter to Her Majesty's Consul flanaral in Ceneva and also by tele- Generar I) Lene 2 and alsa OY phone to London. “Security officers were at once dispatched to Geneva. Swiss police were already making intensive in- quiries. On Sept. 16 Mrs. Mac- Lean’s car was found in a garage in Lausanne. - Ska@ahad left it on the aflerngpn of the 1ith, saying she would #eturn for it in a week. ns garage hand who reported thistagtied that Mrs. MacLean had ¥ VY Gia taken her children to Lausanne's railwa¥ station. On the same day, Sept. 16, Mrs. Dubar reported ta Geneva police the receiplola igle- gram purporting to come from her a daughter. The telegram explained that Mrs, MacLean had been delayed ‘owing to unforeseen circumstances’ and asked- Mrs, Dunbar to inform the school authorities that the two elder children would be returning in a week, . “Mrs. MacLean’s youngest child was referred to in this telegram by a name known only to Mrs. Mac- Lean, her mother and other inti- mates. “The telegram had been handed in at a post offlce in Territet at 30:58 that morning by as womar whose description did NOT agree with that of Mrs. MacLean, @ The handwriting on the tele- gram form was not Mrs, Mac- Lean’s and it showed forciga characteristics similar to those in the telegrams received in 1951 by Lady MacLean, Mrs. MacLean and Mrs. Bassett. 1 “From witnesses in Switzerland, and Austria, it seems clear that the arrangements for Mrs. MacLean’s departure from Geneva had been carefully planned. She went by train from Lausanne, passing the Swiss- Austrian frontier and arriving at Schmarzach St, Veit in the Ameri- can Zone of Austria at approxi- mately 9:15 on the morning of Sept. 12, “A porter at Schwarzach St. Veit and witnesses traveling on the train established she left the train at this point, Further evidence shgws_that she wags met at the station by an _ unknown man driving © car-hearing Austrian number plates, Baad was never traced. Probably it took Mrs. MacLean and the children from Schwarvach St, Veit to neighboring territory in Russian occupation, on her journey to join her “husband.” '- fo “y ' ‘. L had The MacLeans and Burgess vanished and with plenty of help. was only a matter of suspicion until Vladimir Petrov, former Third Sec- retary of the Russian embassy in A Australia, escaped to freedom on April 3, 1954. Said the white papet: “Petrov states that both Messrs. MacLean and Burgess were re- erulted as sples for the Soviet government while siudenis. with the intention that they should carry out their espionage tasks in the Foreign Office, and that In 1951, by means unknown to him, one or other of the two men be- However, their real nae !