Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 24
Page 52
52 / 60
CF Pee ee ed
“Burgess, the Spy. .
Writes a Column
By GEORGE E. SOKOLSKY le
UY BURGESS of the Burgess-Maclean partnership
of Russian sptes in Great Britain and the United
States wrote & plece for The London Sunday Express,
last February, which is of interest at the present mo-
ment because of implications in relation to the forth=
coming Khrushchev-Bulganin visit to Great Britain.
Burgess clarifies Russian policy, as he under- Vinterrowd
stands it, after having said that he and Maclean have oy ind Tele. Room
had every opportunity to meet Russians “of different Holloman
kinds and at all levels, except the highest official level.” fei KR Gandy
Then he says: Mia. BpAalGA
“Tt has been sald that we tried to hurt Anglo-
American friendship in the statement that we made
(when they first showed themselves to foreign corres-
pondents}. This assumption is as false as would be
eny illusion on our part that we could do anything
much to hurt this friendship even if we wanted to.
Only Mr. Dulles eould do that.” ;
Portrayed as Encmy
This is very interesting because obviously John
Faster Dulles is now being portrayed as the enemy of
Great Britain as part of the Communist Party line
in all parts of the world. If he does not go along with
British policy with regard to the Near East, it is to :be
remembered that Sir Anthony Eden has not gone along ©
with American policy with regard to the Far East, As
a matter of fact, if there is any disturbance of Anglo-
Ameérican relations, it is because Great Britain recog-
nized Red China too soon and having done that dg-
parted altogether from both American and Briti
cohcepts of right by insisting that Red China coyid
shpot its way into the United Nations. It has been s@id,
pit not officially, that Great Britain recognized Red
ina after having been promised that the United
States would quickly follow. If such a claim, which I
neard in London a year ago, is correct, the British were
taken in.
Burgess says that he wrote a speech for his chief
in the Foreign Office which “ran roughly as follows’:
“The Chinese People’s Government is a govern-
ment of Chinese people by Chinese people and for
Chinese people. That is why we have recognized it
—
I am willing to claim a participation, and the Right
the Republican Party, which in the United
States Senate is the Jeadership of that p ; é
apparently does not belleve that the voters have any
interest in the matter.
Burgess denies that the present Russian govern-
ment is imperialist of expansionist, although it has
increased its hegemony over the human race from
180,000,006 in 1939 to about $00,000,000 today. The
only reason for the Truman “Containment Policy” and
for NATO is to limit Soviet expansion.
The article was copyrighted by the North American
Newspaper Alliance, Inc., and The London Sunday
Express. Nevertheless it did not attract too much at-
tention, perhaps because few identified Its author as
the spy, probably figuring that it was somebody else
whose ideas were belng given currency. The effort of
Soviet Russia to have Red China recognized by the
United States and the United Nations knows no abate
Se ROVER YO Sheet Gee aaa 276 mal LL ova
ment and apparently the purpose of this article was to
influence both British and American public opinion.
Perhaps that is the job which Burgess and Maclean
hoid in Moscow,
It is astonishing that no one among the forpign
tolrespondents and diplomats in Moscow recogrfized
vA identified Burgess and Maclean during their Gtay
re,
Cepsright, 1956, King Veatetes Brnaivate, Ina.
Wash. Post and
Times Herald
and that is why it js surprising that the United States Wash. News
has not got around to doing so.” | Wash. Star
In a word, this man, a Russian agent, who skipped - } ~f” N. Y. Herald
out of his own country while under investigation and «, pre ; Tribune
who now fis in Moscow in the employ of the Russian “~ N.Y. Mirror
Foreign Office, wrote a speech which actually describes . N. Y. Daily News
British policy and which denounces (“it is surprising”) rei oA tt Dale W ”
American policy. He does not say when he wrote that pf OTE ee Daily Worker
speech but Burgess was employed in the British Foreign . ’ ~owp The Worker
Office during the years 1944 to 1961 and therefore he a APR 31 1956 ew Leader
couid not have been without knowledge of the Korean wr om J hh ee le, 8g ne
War which took so many American lives. - Could it
have been Bevin or Morrison for whom the speech was
written? : . st ot
Blames China Lobby _. _ ety
v7 ft.
Date —APR-1-6 S56 -
— ees
he Washington Post-Times H rald
e met in Washington American officials spo. his morning, 4/ 16/ 56, carried this
agrded with him about Red China. He does not my _ - rtiele with the agnanting -fanda...
whg they were. He atiributes the American fallurejto ‘ZL ty ee renee SNe AGE EIOU OF TNE Last
‘ ina Lobby, of which two paragraphs and the last sentence
Alfre is ht e proprietor, although _
hough ______—_—iof the third paragraph from the end.
- -
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic