Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cesar Chavez — Part 7
Page 59
59 / 147
ware
Six people from Michigan made up the
COMA Teex Force that traveled to the
Coachella Velley to understand the full
implications of the Teamster-United Farm
Worker dispute. The members of the Task
Force were the following: Rev. Peter
Dougherty, Catholic Campus Ministry,
Fastern Michigan University; Pamela
Lemerand, student, Wayne State Univer-
sity; Sr. Joan Tirak, Cathoiic Campus
Ministry, Eastern Michigan University;
Stephanie Dabrowski, student, Wayne
State University; Marie Parker, student,
Eastern Michigan University; Rev. Rey-
nard Winkel, Catholic Campus Ministry,
Wayne State University.
On April 715, 1973, the Teamsters
Union announced that it signed con-
tracts with a majority of the table
grape growers in the Coachella Valley
(California). These growers produce
85% of the valley's table grapes. For the
pest three years these growers had been
under contract with Cesar Chavez' United
Farm Workers' Union. One of the first
goals of our Task Force was to find out
why the UFW was dumped and why the Team-
sters were able to move in and take Over
as the field workers’ representative.
Beginning of the Story
Last December at 8 convention of the
American farm 8ureau, Teamster Pres.
Frank Fitzsimmons proposed an alliance
between organized labor and agribusiness
to fight Chavez and "his revolutionaries"
(NEWSWEEK, May 21, 1973). Incidentally,
the Chavez~led UFW is 30,000 members
strong.
Within months the Teamsters turned
their stiention to the teble grape grow-
ers of California. Since this is s $200
mMiilicn dollar a year industry, one can
understand why the Teamsters would head
im iuhis direction.
For an overview as to where the tabl:
grape vineyards are in Californie, this
three part division seems helpful:
A) Coachella Valley 10% of orape indus.
B) Arvin-Lemont 30% of grape indus.
C) Delano 60% of grape indus.
The UFW has called strikes in the Coa-
chellia Valley end the Arvin-Lamont srea
since most of the growers in these place
have signed with the Teamsters. Right nc
slmost 40% of the table grape industry
has signed up with the Teamsters: con-
tracts in the Delano area dco not expire
until the end of July, 1973.
At first the Teamsters concentrated o
southern California's Coachelle Valley.
With the UFW contract due to expire on
April 14, 1973, Teamster organizers went
into the fields and by March 1, 1973,
they proclaimed to the growers that they
had more than 4,100 signatures of field
workers who claimed they wanted to be
represented by the Teamsters. They were
saying, in effect, that they "decerti-~
fied" the UFW union and established then
selves (Teamsters) as the farm workers'
representative in the table grape indus-
try.
Some Problems with the Teamster Claims
Because of the above there are some
Serious problems with tne latest Team-
ster move against the UFL.
A. There are serious questions about the
legitimacy and authenticity of the sig-
natures gathered by the Teamsters. NEUS-
WEEK's Peter Greenberg (Mey 21, 1973)
discovered upon examiniro “he signeturcs
that many were remarkably Similar. The
«
LL leos! desartment is taking deecis
20QGQGs2 VERS UMEMnL 2S King SELLE
Te
tions under oath from meny ecrke
memes annear on the Tertster recitiaor.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic