◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Charles Lindbergh — Part 11

83 pages · May 09, 2026 · Broad topic: General · Topic: Charles Lindbergh · 81 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
f a “4 A LETTER TO AMERICAN by / CHARLES A. LINDBEBGH This powerful article by Col. Charles A. Lindbergh was published recently Collice . in a national magazine, It is a stirring appeal to the American people to stop, look and listen as they stand on the threshold of one of the greatest decisions in one of the greatest crises in American history. 4 y ADDRESS this letter to every mean and -wemen in Amermca Who is oppcscd to our country’s entry into the European war. I write because we are being led toward that war with ever-increasing rapidity, and by every conceivable subter- fuge. While our leaders have Bhouted for peace, they have constantly directed us toward war, until even now we are seriously invelved. I write to ask your immediate aid in maintaining the independent American des- tiny our forefathers established. I write to warn you that the men who entice us on to war have no more idea of how that war can be won than the governments of France and England had when they declared war on Germany. The interventionists call on us to fight, and then their responsibility ends. They offer no feasible plan for victory. The situation in America today is alarm- ingly similar to that of France and England in the years prior to this war. There, as here, people let their emotions get the better of their judgment; and they had the same unwillingness to face realities, Both coun- tries had refused to take part in a Euro- pean readjustment while there was still time to make it peacefully. Both had refused to make the sacrifice that was essential for adequate rearmament. They, too, had cul- tivated the philosophy that it was necessary to defend someone else in order to defend themselves. How they could defend anyone else if they were unable to defend them- selves, they apparentiy did not consider any ““SeTe woan we a.e wousidering wduy, Their failure is now obvious, and stands out clearly before us. The imposition of “sanctions” did not save Abyssinia; but it threw Italy into the arms of Germany and sowed the seeds for the Axis. The threat of war by England and France did not save Poland; but it forced Germany and Russia into an alliance and precipitated a disastrous war. Adjustments that should have been made in peace and moderation were finally brought by war and resulted in immodera- tion. The faiture to face realities in peace brought the curse of war on Europe. The failure to face the realities of war brought defeat to France and devastation to England. When the last war ended, the victor'ous Allies had two courses open to them. They could either have assisted Germany back onto her feet as a self-respecting nation, ar they could have kept her in a weskened condition by the use of military force. But they followed neither of these policies. Eng- land and France wavered back and forth between the two, while the United States withdrew her armies and her politics to the Western Hemisphere—avowediy forever. _Doring the years immediately succeeding the last war, Germany was heid down with an iron heel. The terms of Versailles were the terms of a military victory, and when Germany defaulted on her payment of repa- rations, French troops occupied the Ruhr. But during the following two decades, Eng- land decided to disarm, while France allowed the equipment of her army to become obso- lete for modern warfare. Then Germany broke the terms of Versailles, rearmed and marched her troops back into the Rhine- land. When this happened, a few men in France and England, with ater vision than the rest, cried out that Germany must be stopped then, or that it would be forever too late. Their statements were met with popular indifference. During the most active years of German Tearmament, France and Engiand exerted relatively little effort to compete. It seemed Immnnecihia fae tham ¢. exclien <r + apne Te aes an taking place in Central Europe. But later, after Germany had trained her armies, built her air force and constructed the Sieg- fried Line, the demand grew in France and England for military action — a demand which culminated in the declaration of war of 1533, and which has aiready caused the defeat of France and the devastation of England. While there was still time to fight, populace and politician refused to jet the armies move. When the time to fight had passed, the arnnies were forced into a hopeless battle. T sat in England. one afterrann in 1088, listening to the man who had charge of co-ordinating defense for the British gov- ernment. I had pleaded with him to take additional steps to safeguard the British position in aviation. I had told him that if this were not done Germany would soon become as supreme in the air as England was at sea. He listened courteously, and then replied that if the wars in Spain and China had demonstrated one thing, it was that the danger of air bombardment, and the damage which could be inflicted by hombing planes hed heen eeyse)s eer ast ares, oo waits, GG OSE TOSSiy Saag KEr- ated. He said that the British aviation pro- gram was being “adequately expanded.” A few months later, at the time of the Munich crisis, I went to see one of the fore- ™most leaders of England. I went at the request of other English leaders, to tell im my belief that the strength of German aviation was under-estimated in England, and that the strength of Russian aviation was almost as much overestimated. He did not agree with me, although he admitted that the situation was serious. While I was there, however, he showed me an official report. concerning British antiaircraft units. +e The report stated that not enoug aircraft guns existed in all England - an adequate defense for the city of alone. Yet that man at that mome advocating war. At the time of Munich, the Ro Force had only a few squadrons of fiehters and hamharc 2 moainwitea RCE Oo. se Vy planes were obsolete, And al] of th together totaled a fraction of the air force. The condition of French : was even more deplorable. There 1 @ Single squadron in France equipp modern pursuit planes, and the €overnmenit was looking forward to t when its aircraft production woul a total of 200 fighting planes per m: When I returned to Paris after . to Russia, in the fall of 1938, I his request, one of the members French cabinet, I gaye him my esti the Russian and German air forces, him of the tremendous expansion of ; aviation that had taken place in G and that Russian aviation had been to keep pace. He replied that my ex confirmed the worst fears of the end anertzcnandasnd tn the sannetia af maa CULT eopongeu wy Lae FCpPOores Gi mission they had recently sent to G: I found that aviation circles in Fr: that time, freely admitted that G would take supremacy of the air al: s00n a5 & War started. From the standpoint of logic, the | situation in Europe was in itself 5 reason to Prevent a declaration of France and England in 1939. But w looked farther, he found that the sa ditions existed in relation to the armies of Europe. Even the civilian tion of Germany had been trained s pared for war, while the people in and England were not. One of the striking differences | ' France and England, during the immediately preceding this war, la fact that France was alert to her hut disorganized; while England wa: ized but only half awake. In Fra ternal conditions were so bad that wondered whether war or revolutio break upon the country firet. In I there was no danger of revolution, people of that nation had never ; thameaniene tn tha tomnn af thie med PHicMScyes VW Lt POMPEO Cl Lis Moo Their minds were still attuned to 1} of sail rather than to that of aircrs way of life in England was ideal f of peace, but fata] for a modern - Germany, on the other hand, one nation that had risen from the prc _of a previous defeai—a nation iess _
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 6
Jump straight to page 6 of 83.
Reader
Charles Lindbergh — Part 16
Stay inside Charles Lindbergh with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Charles Lindbergh Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific Charles Lindbergh topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic