Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Claudia Jones — Part 6
Page 70
70 / 116
en ne ee a a oe
NY 100-81752
York on October 16, 1954, the Judge ruled that the
testimony of government witness JOHN LAUYNER about hi
8
expulsion from the Communist Party remained a substantial
question of law for the United States Supreme Court.
The Government moved for & surrender date for the
following week in order to give defendants an opportunity
to petition the United States Supreme Court for certiorari,
Judge DIMOCK ordered defencants continued on bail pending
appeal and granted the defendants thirty days in which
to file their appeal with the United States Supreme Court.
On October 25, 1954. the Government moved
wee lee oe ot weaw lal
in the United States Court of Appeais, Second Cirscult for
recall of the mandate on appeal which had been issued on
October 15, 1954, and for re-issuance of that mandate forth-
idth,with the clarification that the Court of Appeals
found that the case involved no substantial question which
Should be determined by the Supreme Court and which
would justify the admission of appellants to bail
pending the application for certiorari, The Government also
moved for revomation of appellants bail and immediate
remanding of appellants.
On November 9, 1954, the Government's
application was denied,
Appellants filed a petition for certiorari
in the United States Supreme Court on November 13, 1954,
and the petition was denied on January 10, 1955,
On January 10, 1955, United States District
Judge IRVING R. KAUFMAN ordered revocation of bail
and ordered warrants issued for all defendants except
LOUIS WEINSTOCK, who was then on trial in a separate
perjury proceeding in tne United States District Court,
Washington, D.C. After Attorney HARRY SACHER had argued
before United States District Judge KAUFMAN that it was
not within the power of Judge KAUFMAN to order defendants
remanded since no order had as yet been entered by the
SrensGee eee Re ee ee Se wee Re Ses Eee ete She se
-@-
err
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic