◆ SpookStack

wenn nN Ee EE NY 100-81752 he testified were either false or not entirely true. The hearing on this motion was set for March 10, 1955, by United States District Judge DIMOCK and on February 3, 1955,at a hearing before Judge DIMOCK on a motion to quash a Federal Grand Jury subpoena served on MATUSOU, the date of the heaving was reset for February 10, 1955. The hearing began on February 10, 1955, and concluded on March 21, 1955, On April 22, 1955, United States District Judge DIMOCK filed an opinion denying the defense motion as to all defendants except CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERG who were granted new trials, Defense Attorney KAUFMAN on May 6, 1955, filed a petidm and notice of motion for réargument of the Lotion for new trial on behalf of those defendants whose motions had been denied. This application was Genied by Judge DIMOCK on May 26, 1955. On May 10, 1955, a notice of motion was filed for an order permitting tne defendants TRACHTENBERG and CHARNEY to renew their motions for judgments of acquittal anc to set aside the verdict of guilty and | to enter judgments of acquittal. This motion was denied on May 26, 1956, by Judge DIMOCK. | The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit on June 30, 1955, entered its judgment dismissing the appeals of defendants TRACHTENBERG and CHARNEY from the denial of their motions for judgments of acquittal. This order was entered on July 11, 1955, in the United States District Court by United States District Judge ALEXANDER BICKS making the judgment of the Court of Appeals the judgment of the United States District Court. A stipulation was filed by Defense Attorney KAUFMAN in the United States District Court on September 13, 1955, withdrawing the appeal from Judge DIMOCK's denial of the Defense motion for new trial based on MATUSOW's affidavit and the motion for reurgument of that motion for new trial.