◆ SpookStack

te a SU 164-24 PAGE SEVEN | | . NEAR AIRPORT WITH BEACON AND IMMEDIATELY BEYOND, FARM LAND THUS PROVIDING EXCELLENT BEARINGS FOR JUMP. | IN NORJAK CASE, UNSUB VERY INSISTENT UPON RETRIEVING IN- STRUCTIONS AFTER READING BY PILOT. IN_UAL CASE, SUBJECT. LIKEWISE INSISTENT UPON RETRIEVING INSTRUCTIONS, ADVANCE PREPARATION OF FLIGHT PLAN INSTRUCTIONS IN UAL CASE COULD LOGICALLY REPRESENT REFINEMENT OF M0. ) | . ; INTERVIEW OF SISTER-IN-LAW OF UAL SUBJECT INDICATES SUBJECT HAD ADVISED HER THAT IF HE WERE EVER TO BE INVOLVED IN HIJACKING, HE WOULD NOT SPEND ANY OF HIJACKED LOOT FOR MANY YEARS BECAUSE IT WOULD BE MARKED WITH SUBSTANCE THAT WOULD BE VISIBLE BY USE OF AN ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT AND HE WOULD NOT SPENDSANY OF THE MONEY FOR MANY YEARS BECAUSE HE BELIEVED HE-COULD NOT BE PROSECUTED AFTER SEVEN YEARS FOLLOWING THE CRIME. . INTERVIEWS OF ACQUAINTANCES OF SUBJECT IN UAL CASE INDICATE SUBJECT OBSESSED WITH IDEA OF HIJACKING AND CONTINUALLY BROUGHT UP DISCUSSIONS WHEREIN RE ATTEMPTED TO OBTAIN OPINIONS AS TO WHAT THE “OTHER HIJACKERS HAD DONE WRONG IN THEIR OPERATION. THESE ACQUAINT- ANCES DESCRIBED SUBJECT IN UAL CASE AS NOT PARTICULARLY EXPERT END PAGE SEVEN : | DB Cooper-7712 ee