◆ SpookStack

LA 164-497 and submit to interview if such_immunization were received. During this contactL____] stated he was not, at this time, at liberty to discuss details, names, or places but realized specific data would have to be made available if the United States Attorney (USA) was to arrive.at a prosecutive opinion concerning the criminal liability of those associated with the’ - production. - On 11/9/76,[___] telephonically c the Los Angeles Office and was advised by 2 a [that this matter had been discussed wit Assistant United States Attorne AUSA) Los Angeles, and auSaE said he could grant no corm of written immunization to Federal prosecution based on a set of hypothetical facts, however, he would_be quite willing to discuss specific details with] At this time[___|stated he now understands the hijacker, who us the crime period of time about and they resided out of the State of California. COOPER then reportedly left and according to the_information being furnished him by his client, COOPER may now be dead. He said that his sole concern in thi : is protection of bis client, the studio, | [—Jagainst Federal prosecution for harboring, accessory after the fact, or misprision of a felony. He felt the only way to insure this is to have some written document from the Government assuring they will not be subject to Federal prosecution if the screen writer voluntarily comes forth and relates details concerning his alleged association with COOPER. He understood the facts as presented to him indicated only association with COOPER tock place after the crime was committed, during which time the facts of the crime were related to . On the afternoon of 11/9/76,._—| telephonically contacted the Los Angeles Office and . advised his client has now indicated the -following b6 b7C b6 b7C b6 b7C b6 b7C -2- DB Cooper-15009