Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Emmett Till — Part 1
Page 245
245 / 249
FD-302a (Rev. 16-6-95)
44A-JN-301122, 62D-UN-30045-FD302
Contmuaron of FD-307 of TRANSCRIPT-EMMETYT Til. TRIAL Sept 1955 .0On Page 4
the sheriff of LeFlore County.
MR. CHATHAM: That is all we have for this witness.
(WITNESS EXCUSED)
MR. BRELAND: Your Honor, we don't like to be repetit-
Lous but the District Attorney in propounding questions to
the witness used the words or name "Emmett Till". And there
has been no evidence here to show that either party knew -
the name of Emmett Till at that time.
THE COURT: It is the Court's recollection that Emmett
a Till’s name was mentioned in direct examination. .
| MR. BRELAND: Then we would like to cali Mr. Smith
back to the stand, if you please.
GEORGE SMITH,
Recalled as a witness for further cross examination by the | !
defense, having been duly sworn, upon his oath testified
as follows: me |
RE-CROSS EXAMINATION
BY MR. BRELAND: |
Q If we understand your testimony correctly Mr. Smith,
you asked Mr. Bryant at that time why he went down there
and got that little ole boy, and you just asked him about
j + a boy, and you didn't mention the name “Emmett Till", is
that right? |
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic