Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Fred Hampton — Part 3
Page 230
230 / 251
to perform their duties "'. . . with undue timidity.’ Wood v.
Strickland, 420 U. S. 308, 321." [Hutto v. Finney, supra, 437 U.S.
at 699, n. 32.] .
Rehearing in banc should be granted to prevent a serious mis-
carriage of justice as to federal appellees and to protect the public
interest. |
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above, rehearing should.be granted, and
the case should be reheard in banc.
Respectfully submitted,
BARBARA ALLEN BABCOCK,.-
Assistant Attorney General,
GREGORY C. JONES,
Acting United States Attorney,
* ROBERT E. KOPP,
HARLAND F. LEATHERS,
Attorneys, Civil Division,
Department of Justice,
Washington, D. C. 20530,
Phone: (202) 633-4774.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I served the foregoing Federal Appellees’
Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion~for Rehearing In Banc this 7th
day of June, 1979, by mailing copies thereof, postage prepaid, to:
James D. Montgomery, Esquire
39 South LaSalle Street
Suite 1521. .
Chicago, Illinois 60603
G. Flint Taylor, Jr., Esquire
343 South Dearborn Street
Suite 1607
Chicago, Illinois 60604
- 21-
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic