Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Fred Hampton — Part 3
Page 244
244 / 251
im:
OPINION OF TILE COURT. 13
for a judgment holding them liable. See Brubaker v. King,
505 F.2d 534, 538-39 (7th Cir. 1974). Compare Jaroslawicz
v. Seedman, 528 F.2d 727, 732 (2d Cir. 1975).
The next and crucial question, therefore, is. whether the
plaintiff’s counteraffidavits raised a genuine issue of fact
as to the officers’ reasonable belief and good faith. See
Tristis v. Backer, 501 F.2d 1021, 1024 (7th Cir. 1974);
Strutt v. Upham, 440 F.2d 1236, 1237 (9th Cir. 1971). It is
lear, as the district court found, that they did not.
The pertinent portions of the plaintiff’s counteraffidavits
are set forth in the margin.* The principal assertions in
* The counteraffidavit submitted against Long said, in part:
Trooper Long. . . knew that during that same morning my
son was walking the streets of Woburn, to a. diner and a
barbershop, unarmed, and under surveillance by his men,
was not dangerous, could have been safely arrested during
these few hours, but chose not to do so. There would have
been no risk. of ‘death or serious bodily harm’ during this
. period. Instead he waited until my son made a last minute
trip back into the house for a gun and then followed several
tiles in traffie until they had placed my son in a dangerous
condition, then ‘allowed excessive force to be used while
apprehending my son. ;
. .- Where the shooting that took place it is a busy inter-
section, he. cannot maintain that he was faithfully perform-
ing his. duties to protect the public:
‘The counteraffidavit submitted against MacDonald and Scire
‘said, in part:
Agent MacDonald states in paragraph 19 of his affidavit that
he was about even with the driver (of Maiorana car) when
he heard a shot, and heard Trooper Gong say he was shot.
This could not be so, as Officer Scire testified at the inquest
into the death of my son that he, (Scire) reached the car on
that side, at the same time Long opened the door on passen-
gers’ side. He further testified that MacDonald was behind
him, following him to driver’s side. When he (scire) reached
the driver”s side, he opened the door, pushed the front seat
forward (with the driver still in it) claimed he saw a move-
ment in the back seat of the car and fired one shot {at the
movement) hitting Trooper Long who fell back out of the
ear, erying that he was hit. - ;
Officer Scire then testified that he holstered his gun, then
ran around the car to assist Long, who he knew he shot.
- 13a -
cu
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic