◆ SpookStack

88 Nos. 77-1698, 77-1210 & 77-1370 I do not join in directing the imposition of sanctions under F. R. Civ. P. 87(bX2), although I would favor directing the district court to give consideration to doing so, on remand. I would limit the holding that a prosecutor is not en- titled to full immunity while performing “investigative” functions to the investigative functions of the prosecutor defendants described in this case. PELL, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part, concurring in part. : It has been difficult for me to place this case in a proper perspective, but following the effort to do so I am convinced that the opinion written by Judge Swygert reaches an incorrect result in a substantial number of instances. Therefore while concurring in that opinion wherein it affirms the district court’s judgment and with regard to the reversal as to one group of defen- . dants on one issue, I otherwise respectfully dissent, all as set forth hereinafter. - : The initial difficulty in acquiring a proper perspective, indeed any kind of an overall view, of the case comes from the sheer volume of material it has generated. To begin with, the mass of documents, which is what this court basically has to go on to make its decision, in- cludes some 87,000 pages of evidence, plus exhibits which we can only view visually as a cold record but which was presented audibly to the district court bit by bit, painstakingly and tediously, over the approximate eighteen months that this civil case jury trial took. Next we have before us the contentions of the parties in the so- ealled briefs, occupying more than 800 pages. At this point, the accumulation of additional paper might appear to be drawing to a welcome close. There is vir- tually no dispute as to the basic law applicable to the a